My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06381
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06381
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:50 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Otero
Community
La Junta
Stream Name
Arkansas River & Tributaries
Basin
Arkansas
Title
La Junta, Colorado Local Protection Project Phase I GDM Sediment Investigation
Date
9/1/1985
Prepared For
US Army Corps of Engineers
Prepared By
The Hydrologic Engineering Center
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />5.2.1 Bed Material <br /> <br />The bed material gradations used for the long-term simulation discussed in <br />Chapter 4 were obtained from 1946 data published in the report "Arkansas River <br />and Tributaries above John Martin Dam" (4). A bed material inspection was <br />performed in January 1984 by Fox and Associates of New Mexico, Inc. for the <br />Corps of Engineers' Albuquerque District. Bed samples were taken in the <br />vicinity of La Junta at the following river mile locations: 1197.6, 1198.6, <br />1199.6 and 1200.6. The bed material gradation varied from location to <br />location (see Figure 5.2). These most recent bed material gradations were <br />incorporated into the HEC-6 input data set for the single-event analyses. <br /> <br />5.2.2 InflowinK Load <br /> <br />A small amount of data for the mean annual total sediment volume passing <br />La Junta was presented in the report "Sedimentation in John Martin Reservoir" <br />(6). The standard project flood has a peak flow of 212,000 cfs but the <br />observed data (from 5) were usually for flows less than 3,000 cfs. The total <br />sediment load for the higher single-event flows was developed by using two <br />methods. <br /> <br />The first method determined sediment loads that were in equilibrium with <br />the bed material for specific flow rates. (This procedure is explained in <br />Section 4.2.2.) The second method determined the sensitivity of the river bed <br />profile to changes in the inflowing load. The equilibrium load for the peak <br />SPF flow was used as an upper bound. The load curve was then adjusted <br />downward to provide five hypothetical inflowing load curves shown in Figure <br />5.3. A sensitivity analysis was performed and the load curve that gave the <br />most stable solution was chosen to be used in the single-event simulations. <br />This curve is indicated in Figure 5.3. <br /> <br />5.2.3 Total Load Gradation <br /> <br />The total inflowing load is composed of the suspended load and the bed <br />load. Average suspended load gradation data was obtained from reference 5, <br />Plate 42. It was assumed that the suspended load was 90~ of the total load. <br />The gradation of the bed load was considered to be the same as the gradation <br />of the bed material shown in Figure 5.2. The gradation of the total load was <br />calculated by taking a weighted average of the suspended load and bed load <br />gradations. The resulting total load gradation is shown in Figure 5.4. <br /> <br />5.3 Development of Flood Hydrographs <br /> <br />Hydrographs for three flood events were provided to HEC by the Albuquerque <br />District. The single-event analyses were performed using both existing and <br />project conditions for all three flood magnitudes. The hydrographs correspond <br />to standard project, 100-year and 50-year floods with peak flows of 212,000 <br />cfs, 94,000 cfs and 64,000 cfs, respectively (see Figure 5.5). The <br />hydrographs were discretized for use in the HEC-6 computer program. <br /> <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.