Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. ESTIMATE OF CHANNEL CHANGES FOR A SINGLE FLOOD EVENT <br /> <br />5.1 Development of Geometric Data for HEC-6 Single-Event Simulation <br /> <br />5.1.1 ExistinK Conditions <br /> <br />A study reach for the La Junta project was established from river mile <br />1194.2 to 1201.0. Cross sections must be more closely spaced for the <br />single-event analysis than for the long-term analysis in order to maintain <br />numerical stability in the HEC-6 calculations. The additional geometric <br />information was obtained from a 1976 survey map of the La Junta a"rea. For <br />computational purposes, the study reach was extended upstream two miles to the <br />Fort Lyon Canal Diversion. Cross sections were extended downstream 17 miles <br />in order to tie into the stream gage at Las Animas. The resulting geometric <br />data set contained 31 cross sections of which 20 were within the study reach. <br />Figure 5.1 presents a diagram of the study area along with cross-section <br />locations. <br /> <br />5.1.2 Proiect Conditions <br /> <br />The HEC was provided with a sut'Vey map showing the project levee <br />configurations proposed by the Albuquerque District. These data were obtained <br />from the District's most up-to-date surveys taken in 1976. One levee location <br />was proposed for the south bank in combination with one of two levee locations <br />proposed for the north bank. These correspond to project configurations #3 <br />and #4 in Table 4.2 and are also shown in Figure 5.1. <br /> <br />The single-event analysis was originally to include an investigation of a <br />l75-foot wide low-flow channel. It is suggested here that the presence or <br />absence of such a channel with either levee configuration would have little <br />effect on the overall sediment response of the river during a severe flood <br />event. The low-flow channel would contain less than 5~ of the 212,000 cfs <br />flowing during a standard project flood. Therefore, the low-flow channel was <br />not included as part of the channel cross section for the single-event study. <br /> <br />The existing geometry (from 1976 field data) was modified to include the <br />proposed levee configurations. The levee heights were chosen so that over- <br />topping would not occur at any cross section with levees. <br /> <br />5.2 Development of Sediment Data <br /> <br />Keasured field data for the sediment load that accompanies the high flows <br />of a single-event flood are generally quite rare. Extrapolation of load curve <br />data can lead to serious errors. For example, it is possible to obtain a load <br />in tons/day that corresponds to a sediment concentration greater than one <br />million parts per million (ppm) (or solid rock) for the particular flow. To <br />prevent this from occurring, an isoconcentration line for the maximum expected <br />sediment concentration was plotted. This line was then used as an asymptote <br />for the total load curve at higher flows. <br /> <br />Procedures for developing bed material and inflowing sediment load <br />characteristics for the Arkansas River are discussed in the following sections. <br /> <br />49 <br />