Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 4.3 <br />Existing to Project Cross-Section Correspondence <br /> <br />Existing section <br />(River Mile) <br /> <br />Project Section <br />(arbitrary) <br /> <br />Remarks <br /> <br />1196 . 4 <br />1197.9 <br />1198.1 <br />1199.1 <br />1200.5 <br /> <br />175.1 <br />175.2 <br />175.3 <br />175.4 <br />175.5 <br /> <br />Gage & highway bridge @ La Junta <br /> <br />4.2 Development of Sediment Data <br /> <br />The average measured suspended sediment load of the Arkansas River at the <br />Las Animas gaging station for the 22-year period 1940 through 1962 is 1,646 <br />acre-feet per year. The particle size analysis of the suspended sediment <br />samples gathered at this station indicates an average of 15 percent sand, 66 <br />percent silt, and 19 percent clay. Bed material samples from the Arkansas <br />Ri ver near Las Animas are composed of an average of 12 percent gravel, 78 <br />percent sand and 10 percent silt-sized materials. The average annual flow of <br />the Arkansas River at Las Animas is about one-third of the average annual flow <br />at Pueblo, while the suspended sediment load in the river at Las Animas is <br />about four times that carried by the river at Pueblo. <br /> <br />The decrease in the flow of the river between Pueblo and Las Animas is due <br />mostly to irrigation withdrawals. The increase in sediment load is produced <br />from tributaries draining areas with high sediment production rates. This has <br />resulted in a slow aggradation of the Arkansas River in the vicinity of Las <br />Animas and La Junta. As shown on Figures 4.2 and 4.3, the rating curves at <br />Las Animas and La Junta shifted upwards by 4 ft. and 1 ft. respectively <br />between about 1950 and 1970. <br /> <br />4.2.1 Bed Material <br /> <br />Bed material gradations for the study reach for 1946 were obtained from <br />the SWA report "Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin", Vol II. It <br />was decided to use the single, average gradation presented on Plate 56 of that <br />report (reproduced herein on Fig. 4.4) for the HEC-6 simulations. As <br />individual bed material size distributions are available for various locations <br />along the reach, incorporation of this more detailed data could be <br />accomplished at a later date if deemed appropriate. The average gradation <br />curve was broken into 10 grain size classifications ranging from silt to <br />coarse gravel. <br /> <br />It was thought that sampling of the current bed material might be <br />necessary for calibration and use in the predictive simulations. However, as <br />the bed material observed during the 10-13 Jan 83 field inspection conformed <br />qualitatively to that presented in the J. Martin report, and preliminary model <br />results appeared reasonable, it was decided at the 23 Karch 1983 data review <br />meeting not to obtain additional bed material samples for the purposes of this <br />study. <br /> <br />15 <br />