My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06380
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
FLOOD06380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:49 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:12:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
Adams/Arapahoe/Denver/Broomfield/Douglas/Jeffco
Basin
Statewide
Title
Urban Storm Drainage, Criteria Manual Volume 2
Date
6/1/2001
Prepared By
Wright Water Engineers, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
434
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES <br /> <br />DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) <br /> <br />HS-4 This grade control structure on the South Platte River was a hazard to <br />the boating public until it was retrofitted by the COOT......................................... .....................HS-7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />HS-5 Example of stepped downstream face for a sloping bouider drop structure...... ..................... HS-20 <br /> <br />HS-6 Detail of the grouted sloping boulder drop with a trickle channe section <br />creating the sight and sound of cascading water.......................................... .......................... HS-21 <br /> <br />HS-7 An overall view of the drop structure from the previous page is illustrated <br />here to emphasize the opportunities available for creating an attractive <br />urban hydraulic setting for the riparian corridor .......................................................................HS-22 <br /> <br />HS-8 A vertical hard basin drop structure can be an effective tool for controlling <br />grade, but it is not as desirable as a grouted sloping boulder drop because <br />of safety concerns and aesthetics............................................................................................ HS-26 <br /> <br />HS-9 Close-up of the inside workings of a baffle chute drop after more than <br />three decades of service .......................................................................................................... HS-30 <br /> <br />HS-10 Boatable channels of the District waterways provide enjoyment to a wide <br />variety of citizens.... ......................... ............... ..... ................................................. .................... HS-37 <br /> <br />HS-11 Urban grass channels can experience bank erosion and degradation when <br />established design criteria are not used .................................................................................. HS-39 <br /> <br />HS-12 Upstream and downstream views of a low tailwater basin in Douglas County <br />protecting downstream wetland area ....................................................................................... HS-67 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />HS-13 Culvert outlets are often left unprotected causing downstream degradation........................... HS-70 <br /> <br />HS-14 A stable channel at bridges is important and includes caring for the stream <br />downstream of the bridge as shown here on Cherry Creek .................................................... HS-80 <br /> <br />HS-15 A failed rundown that relied upon a geotextile membrane for stability.................................... HS-99 <br /> <br />HS-16 The unsightly and hazardous 8-foot-high Brown Ditch weir was replaced with <br />three low-head drop structures having a 10:1 downstream slope and a boat <br />chute...................................".................,...,.............................................,................ .............. HS-1 04 <br /> <br />HS-17 Grouted sloping boulder drops can be built in series to create pleasing amenities <br />and to provide stable and long-lived grade control structures ...............................................HS-105 <br /> <br />HS-18 Warning signs can be used to help achieve public boating safety. but signs <br />cannot in themselves serve as a substitute for an appropriate standard of <br />care in the design of a reasonable grade control structures on a boatable <br />waterway................... .................... .................... ............................... .......... ................... ......... HS-1 07 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />HS-vi <br /> <br />06/2001 <br />Urban Drainage & Flood Control District <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.