Laserfiche WebLink
<br />draft 3/20/98 <br /> <br />We expanded our analysis by looking at older extreme floods in semiarid and arid climates where <br /> <br /> <br />HWM evidence can be preserved for many decades after a flood (unpublished data). These include <br /> <br /> <br />the: 1965 Plum Creek flood (Matthai, 1969), about a 1,200-yr flood (Osterkamp and Costa, 1987); <br /> <br /> <br />1976 Big Thompson River flood (McCain et al., 1979), about a 1O,OOO-yr flood (Jarrett and Costa, <br /> <br /> <br />1988); 1982 Lawn Lake dam-failure flood (Jarrett and Costa, 1986) in Colorado, where the discharge <br /> <br /> <br />exceeded the 500-yr flood by a factor of about 30; 1990 flash flood near Opal, Wyoming, which is <br /> <br /> <br />one of the largest flash floods in Wyoming (Corrigan and Vogel, 1993); and several streams in the <br /> <br /> <br />Wasatch Mountains of Utah, which had discharges greater than l00-yr floods (Christensen et al., <br /> <br /> <br />1991), The PSI-HWM data from a range of river settings are representative of evidence typically <br /> <br /> <br />preserved for extreme paleofloods. <br /> <br />Results and Discussion <br /> <br />The surveyed cross-section data at each site (e.g., figs. 2a, 2b, and 3) were used to determine the <br /> <br /> <br />difference between the elevations at the top of the flood deposit (PSI) and the HWM at the flood <br /> <br /> <br />margins for 131 sites in 90 streams. Flood sediments were deposited as mid-channel and point bars <br /> <br /> <br />in the channel and on the floodplain and slack-water sediments were deposited along channel <br /> <br /> <br />margins. In almost all cases, the maximum elevation at the top of flood-deposited sediments (new <br /> <br /> <br />PSIs) closely matches the flood HWM elevations (figs. 4 a-f). No statistically significant relations <br /> <br /> <br />exist between the difference of PSI-HWM and explanatory variables. The average difference between <br /> <br /> <br />PSI-HWM elevations for all data is +0.06 m (+5 percent of depth); for finer-grained sediments <br /> <br /> <br />(SWDs) is -0.025 m (-5 percent of flood depth); for bouldery-flood bars (FBs) not including 1982 <br /> <br /> <br />Lawn Lake dam-failure flood deposits is about +0.2 m (+15 percent); and for the Lawn Lake deposits <br /> <br /> <br />is about +0.4 m (+12 percent). <br /> <br />Bouldery flood mid-channel and point bars, which form in higher energy areas, explain the few cases <br />where the tops of the sediments protrude above the HWM elevations. These bars form either as new <br />bars around an obstruction (e.g., a boulder) or when sediments roll up existing bars and cease motion <br />when flow depth decreases. Record snowmelt flooding in 1995 from many streams in Colorado <br /> <br />7 <br />