Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Table l. Summar y of Discharges <br /> Drainage Area Peak Discharges (Cubic Feet per Second) <br /> Flooding Source and Loca tion (Square Miles) 10-Year 50-Year 100-Year 500-Year <br /> Yampa River <br /> At Downstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 2,150 12,000 15,800 18,300 29,000 <br /> At Upstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 1,873 11,800 14,900 17,000 27,000 <br /> Fortification Creek 4,2001 <br /> At Mouth 258 1,270 2,100 3,300 <br /> At Southern Corporate Limi ts 3,3001 4,9001 <br /> of Craig 258 1,270 2,100 <br /> At Northern Corporate Limits <br /> of Craig 250 1,240 2,050 3,600 12,400 <br /> At Upstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 220 1,240 2,050 3,600 12,400 <br />t-' Sand Gulch <br />w <br /> At Mouth 14.8 325 1,275 2,650 4,950 <br /> At Upstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 9.7 325 1,275 2,650 4,950 <br /> Sand Gulch Tributary <br /> At Mouth 4.4 137 590 1,025 2,375 <br /> At Upstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 4.2 137 590 1,025 2,375 <br /> Brotherton Gulch <br /> At Corporate Limits of Craig 3.8 165 700 1,075 3,000 <br /> At Upstream Limit of <br /> Detailed Study 3.2 165 610 1,000 2,900 <br /> lReduction in Discharge Is Due to Loss of Flow Due to Sheet Flaw in the Over banks <br />