My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06275
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06275
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:27 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:09:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Moffat
Community
Moffat County and Unincorporated Areas
Basin
Yampa/White
Title
FIS - Moffat County and Unincorporated Areas
Date
2/2/1982
Prepared For
Moffat County
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Current FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Approximately 7 miles north of Craig, the Colorado Game and Fish <br />Commission built Ralph White Dam on Fortification Creek. The <br />storage is 600 acre-feet at the permanent pool elevation. The <br />dam was built for recreational purposes and not flood control. <br />For that reason, the effect of the dam in reducing flood peaks <br />is negligible: therefore, it has little effect on the 100- and <br />500-year floods. However, the Ralph White Reservoir seems to <br />have had a positive effect on reducing the ice jam problem downstream <br />in the area of Yampa River and Fortification Creek. <br /> <br />Cedar Mountain Gulch and Pine Ridge Gulch have been channelized <br />immediately upstream of State Highway 13. pine Ridge Gulch has <br />also been channelized downstream of State Highway 13. These im- <br />provements have reduced the limits of 100-year flooding but have <br />had little effect on the 500-year flooding. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the county, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equalled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or 500-year period (recurrence interval) have been selected <br />as having special significance for flood plain management and for flood <br />insurance premium rates. These events, commonly termed the 10-, 50-, <br />100-, and 500-year floods, have a 10, 2, 1, and 0.2 percent chance, <br />respectively, of being equalled or exceeded during any year. Although <br />the recurrence interval represents the long term average period between <br />floods of a specific magnitude, rare floods could occur at short intervals <br />or even within the same year. The risk of experiencing a rare flood <br />increases when periods greater than 1 year are considered. For example, <br />the risk of having a flood which equals or exceeds the 100-year flood <br />(1 percent chance of annual occurrence) in any 50-year period is approxi- <br />mately 40 percent (4 in 10), and, for any 90-year period, the risk in- <br />creases to approximately 60 percent (6 in 10). The analyses reported <br />here reflect flooding potentials based on conditions existing in the <br />county at the time of completion of this study. Maps and flood eleva- <br />tions will be amended periodically to reflect future changes. <br /> <br />3.1 Hydrologic Analyses <br /> <br />Hydrologic analyses were carried out to establish the peak discharge- <br />frequency relationships for floods of the selected recurrence <br />intervals for each flooding source studied in detail affecting <br />the county. <br /> <br />Peak discharges for floods of the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year <br />recurrence intervals for Yampa River, the lower portion of Fortifi- <br />cation Creek, Brotherton Gulch, Cedar Mountain Gulch, and Pine <br />Ridge Gulch were obtained from previous studies conducted by the <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.