Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Over the years, the conversion of once-active floodplain to agricultural production <br />fields through berm construction has considerably narrowed the area available for flood flows, <br />Where discharges around 3,000 cfs once could spread over a large overbank area with minimal <br />depth, they are now confined in extent and exhibit greater depth, This greater depth is <br />primarily responsible for many of the adjacent groundwater saturation problems, When the <br />river is at a high stage for an extended period, the local groundwater level rises and the adjacent <br />farmland becomes saturated, either from hampered drainage or direct wetting by groundwater, <br />An extreme example of this is shown in Figure 7 at the center,pivot irrigation plot, At this <br />location, the 3,000-cfs water surface in the river is roughly two feet higher than the adjacent <br />farmland, <br /> <br />As alluded to, the duration of the high river stage has a direct effect on the severity of <br />the saturation problem. This was apparent in 1995 when a relatively high release extended <br />over several weeks (Figure 4). In addition to farmland, berms and their subsurface zones <br />become saturated. If berms are not engineered for this saturated condition, failure through <br />piping and sloughing can occur, <br /> <br />When evaluating these effects, it is worth bearing in mind that a reduction in the flow <br />released from John Martin Reservoir directly translates to an increase in duration for a given <br />volume of water which must be evacuated. Over the years, the safe flood control release from <br />John Martin Reservoir has been decreased, The current 3,000-cfs level is the minimwn <br />necessary for effective flood damage reduction operations, A theoretical reduction below this <br />level would result in further channel adjustment, preswnably, by narrowing, When upstream <br />rainfall events initiated flood control operations, river stages would remain high for an even <br />longer period of time than the current operation entails, The price paid for reduction in <br />operating capacity were effectively illustrated in 1995, This is why the maintenance of the <br />current 3,000 cfs level, at a minimwn, is essentiaL An increase in operational channel capacity <br />would reduce saturation problems because it would shorten durations; but achievement of this <br />may be difficult, given the extent of encroachment that has already occurred, And increasing <br />the capacity would have to be balanced with availability of flows of this magnitude on a <br />frequent enough basis to maintain the channel at this capacity, <br /> <br />3.3 ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Historic and current ecological conditions were determined from scientific literature, <br />government reports, consultation with private individuals and agency representatives, and site <br />visits, <br /> <br />Prowers County lies within the Southwestern Tablelands ecoregion which is transitional <br />between the Southern Rocky Mountain and Western High Plains ecoregions (Bailey 1976), <br />The native plant community outside the Arkansas River floodplain is comprised of short, <br />prairie grasses, Common species include blue grama, side,oats grama, buffalo grass, galleta, <br />alkali sacaton, sand dropseed, western wheatgrass, and three-awn, Throughout the lower <br />Arkansas River valley, agricultural and range lands predominate, often directly abutting the <br />river channeL <br /> <br />25 <br />