Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />FUTURE FLOODS <br /> <br />Although floods of the saMe magnitude as most of those that have <br /> <br /> <br />occurred in the past could recur in the future, discussion in this <br /> <br /> <br />report is limited to those designated as the Intermediate Regional <br /> <br /> <br />and Standard Project Floods. The Standard Project Flood, a rare <br /> <br /> <br />event, would be larger and would occur less frequently than an <br /> <br />Intermediate Regional Flood, but could reasonably be expected to <br /> <br /> <br />occur in the future. The most severe flood conditions on the Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />and Gunnison Rivers are likely to occur durinn the snowmelt runoff <br /> <br /> <br />season from late Apri I through June. <br /> <br /> <br />The flooding to be expected from drainage basins tributary to <br /> <br /> <br />the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers in the study area are not included <br /> <br /> <br />in this report because most are less than 2-3 square mi les in area <br /> <br />and as such are considered to be local drainaae problems. Of the <br /> <br /> <br />three larger drainages, Indian ~ash, which has been a flood threat <br /> <br /> <br />to Grand Junction, is now control led by a Soi I Conservation Service <br /> <br /> <br />project that affords protection aaainst runoff of Standard Project <br /> <br />Flood magnitude. <br /> <br />Debris collecting on bridge piers and deposition of si It in the <br /> <br /> <br />channel are not expected to cause reduction in channel capacity or <br /> <br />cause an increase in water depths (backwater effect) upstream of these <br /> <br /> <br />structures. Only the effect of vegetation normally existing in the <br /> <br /> <br />floodways were considered in preparing the maps, profi les, and other <br /> <br /> <br />illustrations showing the Intermediate Regional and Standard Project <br /> <br />Floods. <br /> <br />15 <br />