My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06258
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06258
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:24 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:07:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
25
County
Mesa
Community
Grand Junction
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Floodplain Information Report - Colorado and Gunnison River, Grand Junction, Colorado
Date
3/1/1973
Designation Date
10/1/1973
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />FUTURE FLOODS <br /> <br />Although floods of the saMe magnitude as most of those that have <br /> <br /> <br />occurred in the past could recur in the future, discussion in this <br /> <br /> <br />report is limited to those designated as the Intermediate Regional <br /> <br /> <br />and Standard Project Floods. The Standard Project Flood, a rare <br /> <br /> <br />event, would be larger and would occur less frequently than an <br /> <br />Intermediate Regional Flood, but could reasonably be expected to <br /> <br /> <br />occur in the future. The most severe flood conditions on the Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />and Gunnison Rivers are likely to occur durinn the snowmelt runoff <br /> <br /> <br />season from late Apri I through June. <br /> <br /> <br />The flooding to be expected from drainage basins tributary to <br /> <br /> <br />the Colorado and Gunnison Rivers in the study area are not included <br /> <br /> <br />in this report because most are less than 2-3 square mi les in area <br /> <br />and as such are considered to be local drainaae problems. Of the <br /> <br /> <br />three larger drainages, Indian ~ash, which has been a flood threat <br /> <br /> <br />to Grand Junction, is now control led by a Soi I Conservation Service <br /> <br /> <br />project that affords protection aaainst runoff of Standard Project <br /> <br />Flood magnitude. <br /> <br />Debris collecting on bridge piers and deposition of si It in the <br /> <br /> <br />channel are not expected to cause reduction in channel capacity or <br /> <br />cause an increase in water depths (backwater effect) upstream of these <br /> <br /> <br />structures. Only the effect of vegetation normally existing in the <br /> <br /> <br />floodways were considered in preparing the maps, profi les, and other <br /> <br /> <br />illustrations showing the Intermediate Regional and Standard Project <br /> <br />Floods. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.