Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />TECHNIQUES OF WATER-RESOUJl{)ES INVESTIGATIONS <br /> <br />is dependent on (1) inflow, (2) size of pipe, and <br />(3) size of pond. This factor can be determined <br />only by continual reading of a gage or from a <br />recorder chart. Because continuous records of <br />stage usually are not available at culvert sites, <br />an estimate must be made from recorder graphs <br />of nearby streams. <br />Rates of rise in ponds subject to cloudburst <br />runoff have been recorded as high as 10 feet <br />per hour where the ou tflow was through " <br />small pipe. The ponds at these places had sur- <br />face area.s of 10-15 acres. If this same flow <br />were ponded at an ordinary crest-stage site, <br />the rise could be considerably greater. <br />The reduction in peak flow through any.given <br />culvert varies with stage as shown in figure 26. <br />In general, pondage does not exist to any great <br />degree at low stages. However, if the culvert is <br />set high in the fill, then a sizeable pond may <br />form before flow through the pipe begins. For <br />this situation many low peaks may be com- <br />pletely absorbed in storage. <br /> <br />Stage-discharge relationships for culverts <br /> <br />Many small-area, high-wat.er gaging st.at.ions <br />instrumented with crest-stag-e gng:es are located <br />at culverts because of the convenient means-of <br />measuring peak discharge. At many such in- <br />stallations experience has shown that either type <br />1, 2, or type 4 flow may be expected through a <br />considerable range of discharge. At high heads, <br />types 1 and 2 flow will usually change to either <br />type 5 or 6 flow, respectively. For example, a <br />steep culvert with free getaway might always <br />support type J flow until the headwater-diam- <br />et,er ratio reaches 1.5, when flow will become <br />oit her type 5 or 6. A flat culvert with Cree get- <br />H-WllY mig-ht ulwnys hll'~e type 2 flow llt head- <br />wnl('I'-ditUlwtel' mtios less thun 1.5. 'Vilh an <br />inh'fllH'diRtc slope tutd free gettlwny, II trunsi- <br />tioll from type I to type 2 flow might always <br />lH'l'\It' 1\1 11 relat.ively fixed upstream stage. AIs'o, <br />11 culn'rt mny nlwn:v~ he submerged at both <br />ends. so thnt, type 4 flow will oCCllr nt, all high <br />stnges. <br />Gages shollld alw"ys be installed "t the ap- <br />proach section and alon~ the downstream <br />embankment if tailwnter can be significnnt, A <br />st.nge-dischnrge rela.tion, often called !\ rnting <br />curye, can be prepared in ndynnce of actual <br />flood peaks, but several field verificntions oC the <br /> <br />accuracy of the crest-stage recordings and of <br />the constancy of flow type should be made <br />before the rating curve is used. For types 1 and <br />2 flow various critical depths can be assumed, <br />and the corresponding discharges and head- <br />water elevations computed, For type 4 flow, <br />dic;charge can be computed for various ralls, <br />becnllse d\scharge is a function of the difference <br />in water-surface elevation between headwater <br />'"HI tailwnter, Type ~ flow does not lend it.self <br />to a direct computation of the rating curvel <br />bnt n Cairly reliable rating can be developed in <br />the manner discussed below by making nu- <br />merous computations usin~ assumed yalues. <br />Field data are very valuable, however, in deter- <br />mining the usable range of values: There is no <br />need for making many computations in the <br />range where the curves will never be used, <br />In a steep channel the point of zero flow at, <br />the gage mny be higher than the point of zero <br />flow at the culvert entrance. In this case t.he <br />channel is the control "t low st"ges, and t.he <br />theoreticnl curve cnnnot be used until the cIII- <br />'vert becomes the con tro1. Unless the Frollde <br />number at the approach section is less than <br />about 0.70, there is no assurance that the culvert <br />is the cont,ro1. Even then, n field check m"y be <br />necessary to ensure against a sharp break in <br />channel slope just. above the culvert. <br />The effect of a changing approach section <br />must be considered in drawing ratings for low- <br />head flow. Rating curves should not be used if <br />the approach channel shifts sufficiently to alter <br />the approach velocity head or friction loss, <br />Small changes in area.s will have no effect <br />provided the velocity head and friction loss "re <br />small, bllt they may have considerable effect <br />where these items are large, When the "pproach <br />channel is f"irly stable, Cllrves oC area and con- <br />yeyance are helpful in making computations {Jf <br />discharge. <br />The rating curves shown in the section under <br />t.ransitions are combinat~ons of curves repre- <br />senting certain types of flow, These figures are <br />used to show rating curves for flow types 1-6, <br />tlS well as the transitions between certain com- <br />binations. <br />Current-met<.. measurements shonld be made <br />to help define rating curves, These are especially <br />vnlu"ble at low stages iC there is a possibility <br />of critical flow occurring between the approach <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />--e <br />