My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06186
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
North Carolina Mitigation Strategy Report
Date
2/1/1997
Prepared For
North Carolina
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mitigation Strategy Report <br />FEMA-1134-DR-NC <br /> <br />State of North Carolina <br />Division of Emergency Management <br /> <br />The torrential rain accompanying Fran coupled with pre-existing conditions caused widespread and <br />record-breaking riverine flooding. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), rainfall <br />in early September exceeded one foot in several locations. Floodwaters in Raleigh reached their <br />highest levels since 1973. The Neuse River Basin experienced some of the most severe and prolonged <br />flooding. At Goldsboro, peak water levels were measured by USGS at 12,2 feet above flood stage. <br /> <br />Fran was moving northward at less than 20 mph when it made landfall on the North Carolina coast. <br />Although the center passed over the Cape Fear area, the radius of winds extended over much of the <br />North Carolina coastal areas, including Brunswick, New Hanover, Pender, Onslow and Carteret <br />counties. At landfall, the minimum central pressure was estimated at 954 Mb [millibars] and the <br />maximum sustained surface winds were estimated at 115 mph (weather surveillance radar at <br />Wilmington, North Carolina, measured winds in excess of 135 mph aloft as the inner convective <br />bands approached the Cape Fear area). <br /> <br />Wind damages varied along the storm track, The most significant wind related damages occurred <br />along the coast. As the storm moved inland, most damages were caused by trees falling on homes, <br />businesses and other structures. While hurricane force winds often decline rapidly as a storm moves <br />over land, Hurricane Fran sustained fairly high winds across the State. For example, wind gusts of <br />up to 69 miles per hour were measured as far inland as the Raleigh-Durham Airport, These winds <br />caused trees to fall on more than 4,000 structures. <br /> <br />Hurricane Fran produced a coastal storm surge that was measured at heights of up to 12 feet. The <br />storm surge caused flooding as far north as the Pamlico River. Stillwater surge heights reached five <br />feet at South port and the Town of Beaufort, respectively. The areas most severely impacted by <br />storm surge were the coastal barrier islands, including Pleasure Island, Shell Island, Topsail Island, <br />and Bogue Island. These areas were not only hit hard by the surge and heavy waves, but also <br />experienced the highest winds, North Topsail Beach was devastated by the surge which included <br />breaking waves reaching heights of over ten feet. Structures constructed to pre-1985 building <br />standards, including those which were not built on elevated, reinforced piers, frequently collapsed <br />due to the combined effects of erosion, flood loads and/or impact with debris. Collapsed structures <br />contributed to the large quantities of debris, which when carried by storm surge, significantly affected <br />adjacent and landward structures, <br /> <br />Hurricanes Bertha and Fran dramatically redefined the shore line and protective dune system, thereby <br />further exposing already vulnerable coastal communities to future storms. Varying levels of dune <br />and beach erosion occurred from Kure Beach to Atlantic Beach, causing the loss of vegetation and <br />changes in the mean high water line. Changes in the established vegetation line may reduce the <br />size of buildable lots along the shore. For those buildings that were substantially damaged, rebuilding <br />may not be allowed under Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) setback requirements. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Hurricane Fran, while causing extensive damage, was by no means catastrophic. A Category Five <br />storm, with winds exceeding 155 miles per hour and a potential storm surge above 18 feet, would <br />cause a level of destruction significantly higher than that which was experienced during Hurricane <br />Fran, Thus, it is incumbent on those who seek to rebuild to do so in a manner that makes North <br />Carolina less susceptible to damages following the next hurricane. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.