My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06186
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
North Carolina Mitigation Strategy Report
Date
2/1/1997
Prepared For
North Carolina
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mitigation Strategy Report <br />FEMA-1134-DR-NC <br /> <br />Slate of North Carolina <br />Division of Emergency Management <br /> <br />Appendix A <br /> <br />Summary of Recommendations <br /> <br />{appearing chronologically in the Mitigation Strategy Report} <br /> <br />. Hazard Mitigation Planning Begins at the Local Level <br /> <br />. Mitigation strategies should be driven by counties and municipalities because they are familiar <br />with the local hazards. <br /> <br />. Local jurisdictions should engage in hazard identification, risk assessment, and the development <br />of an overall mitigation plan. <br /> <br />. Mitigation plans should reduce future damages, contribute to public safety and welfare, and preserve <br />economic vitality. <br /> <br />. Mitigation projects should be compatible with the local jurisdiction's overall planning process and <br />the State's hazard mitigation plan. <br /> <br />. The formation and implementation of local hazard mitigation plans are highly encouraged. <br /> <br />. A hazard mitigation plan should be compatible with and/or incorporated into a community's <br />comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />. Education and training of public officials and citizens is essential to the implementation of sound <br />mitigation strategies and should therefore be encouraged. <br /> <br />. The purchase and dedication of undeveloped flood-prone property or conservation easements as <br />open space should be encouraged. <br /> <br />. Local governments should work with land conservancies to purchase undeveloped properties or <br />conservation easements when possible. <br /> <br />. Coastal Areas Require Special Planning Emphasis <br /> <br />. Coastal storm surge modeling should be initiated using new coastal baseline data. <br /> <br />. New coastal surge data should be used in conjunction with revised FIRMs to encourage more <br />stringent building codes, subdivision ordinances and local planning practices. <br /> <br />. The CAMA land use plans should be strengthened in two ways: (1 )requiring mandatory <br />implementation of plans by local governments, and (2)requiring that zoning and subdivision ordinances <br />be consistent with the adopted plans. <br /> <br />. Coastal community officials should provide information to current and potential residents and <br />business persons regarding the policy implications of CBRA. <br /> <br />. Real estate agents who sell coastal property should inform potential buyers of the hazards associated <br />with home ownership or the operation of a buSiness on a barrier island. <br /> <br />. As a requirement of maintaining a real estate license, coastal real estate agents should be thoroughly <br />familiar with existing Cobra Zones and the implications of purchasing property in these areas. <br /> <br />Page 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.