Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mitigation Strategy Report <br />FEMA-1134-DR-NC <br /> <br />State of North Carolina <br />Division of Emergency Management <br /> <br />Drainage systems were inadequately maintained in many areas. This significantly increased flood <br />levels in some communities. Several municipalities, particularly those in the coastal plain, are located <br />in areas that are naturally predisposed to flood. These low-lying areas will require significant drainage <br />improvements. Once completed, drainage systems must be maintained. Communities should regularly <br />inspect drainage improvements and review drainage maintenance programs. Drainage structures, <br />including culverts and pipes, should be upgraded as needed. Perhaps most important is the need for <br />communities to beller coordinate proposed improvements and existing water management plans with <br />neighboring locales. Coordination is necessary in order to improve basin-wide storm water management <br />plans to include larger planning and land use issues as they relate to the mitigation of regional flood <br />hazards. Communities facing repeated flooding should discourage continued development in the <br />floodplain as part of a comprehensive storm water management plan. <br /> <br />. Dam Failures <br /> <br />Dams are an often overlooked element of public infrastructure. In North Carolina, dams exist throughout <br />the State and have played an important role in its economic development. Dams are relied on to <br />generate power, provide communities with drinking water, and protect individuals from floods. There <br />are over 4,600 dams in North Carolina. According to the Division of Land Resources, approximately <br />1,700 dams pose a risk to pubiic safety and property if a dam failure were to occur. Communities <br />continue to develop along the State's rivers, many in potential dam failure inundation zones. Further <br />exacerbating the potential risk to citizens is the disrepair of many dams and the lack of sound plans to <br />help guide necessary repairs and warning systems to alert the public In the event of a dam failure. <br /> <br />As a result of Fran, there were three major dam failures and twelve minor failures involving private <br />facilities. Thus, it is imperative that the State assess all dams to determine their vulnerability to future <br />flood events, This assessment should include a study to determine the degree of risk to people and <br />property downstream in the event of a dam failure. An additional outreach effort should be undertaken <br />to make public officials more aware of the potential dangers associated with existing dams, particularly <br />those that are no longer operational. Furthermore, private dam owners should be informed of proper <br />dam maintenance and operation. <br /> <br />. Agricultural Losses <br /> <br />According to the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, Hurricane Fran caused an estimated <br />$684 million in damages to the State's agriculture industry, This was over three times the damages <br />sustained during Hurricane Bertha. Tobacco and corn crops were hit especially hard. The damages <br />to collon, sweet potatoes, and peanuts are still unknown. Crops in the field sustained wind and <br />water damages, and tobacco in barns was ruined due to the loss of electricity. Damages to crops in <br />the field could be reduced by properly maintaining drainage systems. Backup generators in tobacco <br />barns could be used to lessen future losses due to power outages. <br /> <br />Losses to the livestock and poultry industry included farm structures, animals, and buildings housing <br />livestock. Over 16,000 hogs, as well as one million chickens and turkeys, were lost. In some cases, <br />ranchers lost compiete flocks due to the inundation of buildings with flood water. As a result of the <br />intense rains associated with Hurricane Fran, several agricultural waste lagoons were overtopped. <br />As these structures are rebuilt, new construction should be at least two feet above the BFE-or the <br />highest flood of record, which ever is greater In cases where farmers are able to do so, new agricultural <br />structures-including waste lagoons, should be buill out of the floodplain or highest recorded flood <br />extent, whichever is greater. The possibility of using overflow pipes in waste lagoons should also be <br />investigated. Overflow pipes allow rain water to drain from the lagoon before being overtopped <br />thereby preventing the failure of the lagoon. However, the use of overflow pipes must be reviewed <br />carefully in order to ensure that this does not encourage farmers to fill a lagoon with more waste <br />than is acceptable under existing regulations. The use of overflow pipes must also comply with <br />current DEHNR outflow rules and standards, <br /> <br />Page 17 <br />