My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06186
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06186
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:08:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:05:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
North Carolina Mitigation Strategy Report
Date
2/1/1997
Prepared For
North Carolina
Prepared By
FEMA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mitigation Strategy Report <br />FEMA-1134-DR-NC <br /> <br />State of North Carolina <br />Division of Emergency Management <br /> <br />One regulatory measure designed to conserve protective dunes is the CAMA coastal construction <br />setback requirement. The minimum setback requirement for new construction or the repair of <br />substantially damaged structures is 30 times the average long-term rate of erosion at the construction <br />site. In areas where the erosion rate is less than 2 feet, the minimum setback is 60 feet. Setbacks are <br />measured from the first line of stable natural vegetation. Erosion rates are established by DCM. Because <br />the first line of vegetation has been destroyed in some areas, the Coastal Resources Commission <br />(CRC) established a temporary rule for establishing setbacks in these areas. In certain areas, the <br />DCM will approximate the location at which the vegetation line is expected to reestablish itself based <br />on several factors. <br /> <br />Fil!urc 6: Dune Erosion Emerald Isle <br /> <br />These factors <br />include pre-Fran <br />aerial photography <br />(taken post-Bertha <br />in July 1996), post- <br />storm elevations, <br />and post-storm <br />high water lines. <br /> <br /> <br />[:\ <br />~~,:' <br />~h_.<,~ <br />~-~:~g:,~~~,~ '~~ <br /> <br />New and repaired <br />substantially <br />damaged <br />structures must be <br />located landward <br />of the required <br />setback. In some <br />cases, construction <br />will not be permitted <br />because there is <br />insufficient land <br />remaining on the lot. If numerous contiguous properties exist that cannot be buill back, and property <br />owners are willing to release the title, the State should work with local governments to dedicate that <br />land as open space. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />. Riverine Issues and Mitigation Opportunities <br /> <br />. Riverine Flooding <br /> <br />In the days prior to the hurricane, many areas in the mountains, the piedmont and the coast reported <br />significant rainfall amounts. Cities experiencing high rainfall amounts included Greensboro (5.6 inches), <br />Siler City (3.25 inches), Fayetteville (1.94 inches), New Bern (3,76 inches) and Wilmington (2.55 <br />inches). As a result, soils were saturated and unable to absorb the rains that followed, During Hurricane <br />Fran, many communities throughout the disaster area were subjected to severe riverine flooding. <br />Rutherford County experienced 12.49 inches of rain during a 3 hour period at Sugar Loaf Mountain. <br />As a result, severe flash flooding occurred, destroying several homes and businesses located adjacent <br />to the Broad River. Almost 9 inches fell on September 5th and 6th at the Raleigh/Durham Airport, <br />causing significant localized flooding. According to the USGS, peak flows in the Tar River, near the <br />cities of Tar River and Louisburg, exceeded the 500 year flood recurrence interval. In some areas <br />along the Tar River, water levels rose more than 20 feet above normal. <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.