Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />V. FLOOD HAZARD AREA DELINEATION <br /> <br />The 100- year fl ood d i sch arges shown in the fi gures ment i oned above are <br />conservative in that the highest discharge rate calculated for a subreach <br />is used for the entire subreach length, not just for the point for which <br />it was calculated. In general, discharge values were selected such that <br />they increased in step fashion as the flood progressed downstream. One <br />exception to this is near the downstream end of the study area where a <br />slight reduction in the peak discharge occurs. This exception is attrib- <br />uted to the routing procedure used and reflects a more rapid increase in <br />flood plain storage capacity than in the inflow from the tributary drainage <br />area; i.e., if no further inflow occurred, the peak discharge would get <br />smaller as the flood proceeded dO\-Instream since the constant flood volume <br />would be spread out over a longer length of the channel. <br /> <br />A. FLOOD FREQUENCY AND DISCHARGE <br /> <br />Floods have occurred in the past and will continue to occur in the future <br />along Dad Clark Gulch with magnitudes equal to and greater than those that <br />have already occurred. As development progresses within the drainage basin <br />the flooding potential will increase and actual flooding will occur more <br />frequently. <br /> <br />The Dad Clark Gulch drainage basin has been analyzed to determine the <br />discharge at various key locations along the flood plain for the 100-year <br />flood event. The 100-year flood event is defined as that which has a one <br />percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in anyone year. The 100-year <br />flood is considered by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, the <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board, and the Federal Insurance Administra- <br />tion, as the flood magnitude for which flood plains should be designated <br />for regulatory and improvement purposes. In Colorado, the 100-year flood <br />plain is an area of state interest as defined in H.B. 1041. Lesser floods <br />with higher probabil ities of occurrence have, therefore, not been con- <br />sidered here. Flood magnitudes greater than the 100-year flood magnitude <br />can and wi 11 occur and plans for 1 and improvement adj acent to the 100- year <br />flood plain should consider the probability of flood damage. <br /> <br />B. FLOOD PLAIN AND FLOODWAY DATA <br /> <br />The Dad Clark Gulch flood plain has been divided into six reaches in order <br />to more readily identify the various tributary branches of the waterway. <br />Refer to Basin Boundary Map in the Appendix of this report for exact <br />locations of each of the six reaches. <br /> <br />The peak flow profiles given in Figures 6 through 11 in the Appendix show <br />the discharges developed in the hydrologic portion of this study for the <br />100-year flood event and are the discharges used in the hydraulic analysis <br />portion of the flood hazard area delineation. The discharge values shown <br />are those which could occur under fully developed conditions without ~ <br />mitigating measures being taken to control or retard the increased runoff. <br />A subsequent report wi 11 address reduced di sch arge rates wh ich are more <br />representative of final design conditions and will describe the mitigating <br />measures which will be taken to achieve a discharge rate which should not <br />exceed pre-development conditions at the downstream edge of the Highlands <br />Ranch development, i.e. County Line Road. <br /> <br />The lOO-year flood plain limits and water surface profiles for each of <br />these reaches of the Dad Clark Gulch flood plain are shown on the Flood <br />Hazard Area Del ineat ion drawi ngs (see Appendix), and the computed 100-year <br />flood elevations for the various cross section locations are tabulated in <br />Tables 3 and 4 as discussed earlier. A brief description of the flooding <br />for each of these reaches follows: <br /> <br />9 <br />