Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11. The public media are key to gaining and maintaining public interest, involvement and support of <br />the disaster mitigation planning effort. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />12. Thoughtful planning should help counter the crises-seeking attitude of the media. Planners must <br />anticipate this conflict. They must strongly encourage the media to use properly phrased <br />information and demand that the media be responsive to the entire planning process. <br /> <br />G. Research <br /> <br />Both basic and applied (practical) research is of interest to three major groups: 1. legislators; 2. mitigation <br />planners; and, 3. opponents to mitigation, who seek support of their opinions. On the whole, research <br />provides an endorsement for positive mitigation options. <br /> <br />1. Research involves scientific investigations into the prevention or mitigation of disasters and the <br />cause of hazards. It includes applied research or demonstrations which illustrate the feasibility of <br />implementing new techniques or findings on mitigation. <br /> <br />2. The mitigation manager should create a "user group" to advise on appropriate aspects of research. <br />A user group should be concerned with user research needs and variations for affected parties. <br />They should not be concerned in research designs or other technical content. <br /> <br />3. The manager should develop public information and education advisory groups, to enhance <br />dissemination opportunities and to improve the use of research findings. <br /> <br />4. The manager should obtain commitments from government that research results will be given full <br />consideration. <br /> <br />5. The manager should keep interested groups involved throughout the research project. <br /> <br />6. A fundamental dilemma exists between basic mitigation research and its application, due to the <br />difficulty in distinguishing one from the other. This dilemma is reflected in the continuing <br />frustration of mitigation practitioners with mitigation research. <br /> <br />7. Effective mitigation requires that researchers and users work together to resolve these tensions. <br /> <br />H. Structural <br /> <br />Structural mitigation solutions encompass actual engineering and mechanical devices or methodologies <br />which enhance mitigation. Examples include anti-hurricane structures, avalanche control, community <br />protective tornado shelters, flood diversion measures, more reliable siren warning systems, prescribed <br />burning of forests to reduce combustible matter, seeding thunderstorm clouds with silver iodide crystals, <br />stream bank stabilization, and windbreak restoration. <br /> <br />124 <br />