My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06100
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:53 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:00:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Basin
Statewide
Title
Design of Stable Channels with Flexible Linings
Date
10/1/1975
Prepared By
Hydraulics Branch, Federal Highway Adminstration
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Colorado State University (CSU) has under development a riprap <br />design method which applies not only to channel linings but <br />also to riprap design at bridge abutments and other channel,. <br />discontinuities (8). However, from preliminary evaluation ' <br />it does not appear that results from the CSU method will <br />differ appreciably from the methods of this circular, <br />assuming uniform, developed channel flow. When the flow is <br />rapidly varied, as when discontinuities such as bridge <br />abutments disrupt the flow, the methods of this circular <br />should not' be ,'used. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />it <br /> <br />III. Design Concepts <br /> <br />The basic design method presented in this circular is based on <br />the concept of maximum permissible depth of flow, coupled with <br />the hydraulic resistance of the particular lining material. <br />In all cases, the lining material defines the hydraulic <br />resistance of the channel while providing its own peculiar <br />degree of erosion protection. <br /> <br />Erosion Prevention <br /> <br />The dmax charts are used to define the maximum permissible <br />depth of flow for a particular lining, based on channel slope, <br />So' and the erodibility of the underlying soil. The maximum <br />permissible depth concept is based on the tractive force <br />theory of channel lining design. Tractive force, basically, <br />is the shear stress exerted by the flow on the channel perimeter. <br />For wide channels of any shape, and for a given channel slope, <br />depth, and lining, the vertical velocity distribution in the <br />central and deepest section, where wall effects are negligible, <br />should be identical. Also, the first scour occurs at the <br />deepest portion of the channel, since the wall or bottom shear <br />stress is greatest in that portion. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />If ,the depth of flow, channel slope, lining, and soil are the <br />same in all channels shown in Figure 1, then the flow rate <br />and the mean channel velocity for the three channels will be <br />different, but in the central section of the channels, <br />represented by AX, the vertical velocity distribution and <br />bottom shear stress will be nearly identical. Therefore, in <br />these channels, there exists a limiting depth of flow above <br />which scour will occur, and this depth, dmax, is the same <br />for all wide channels of the same longitudinal slope, lining, <br />and underlying soil. Of course, any depth of flow less than <br />dmax is noneroding. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.