Laserfiche WebLink
<br />36 <br /> <br />Columbia River drainage. The adopted variation with elevation, which is <br />proportional to the variation in precipitable water, is consistent with the <br />method used 'for moisture-maximizing the greatest observed least-orographic <br />rains for guidance in setting the level of 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) convergence PMP. <br /> <br />The maximum l2-hr persisting 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) dew points for August gen- <br />eral storms (Schwarz and Hansen 1978) of 730 (230C) were used for determining <br />the percent reduction due to effective barriers and elevations. The August <br />dew points tend to give less reduction than winter dew points. High-eleva- <br />tion rainfall would be unreasonably reduced if winter dew points were used, <br />particularly because the use of a single moisture chart does not allow for <br />the high wind and therefore higher rainfall capability at the higher eleva- <br />tion in the cool season. <br /> <br />Figure 2.18 shows the reduction (in percent) of 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) conver- <br />gence PMP for effective barrier and elevation over the Southwestern States. <br />There is agreement between the patterns shown in figures 2.17 (barrier/eleva- <br />tion) and 2.18 (reduction of 1000-mb (lOO-kPa) convergence PMP) with one <br />exception. Figure 2.18 contains a large area of 45% reduction in north- <br />eastern Arizona, to the lee (northeast) of the Mogollon Rim. A continuous <br />approximate 8,000-ft (2,440-m) barrier does not exist to support the 45% <br />feature directly. We believe this factor is justified, since the effect of <br />downslope motion behind the major barrier is to produce additional drying of <br />the air which is equivalent to a higher effective barrier. Further downwind, <br />the 45% reduction line has been closed off to indicate the gradual influence <br />of recharge of moisture below 8,000 it (2,440 m). <br /> <br />When using figure 2.18 to determine a percent of convergence PMP for a <br />specific basin, interpolate between the isopleths. However, for locations that <br />lie within closed contours or at the end of gradients, (within the 95% con- <br />tour in southern California, and within the 50% contour in north-central Nevada, <br />for example), the correct value is that of the last identified contour, i.e., <br />do not extrapolate. <br /> <br />2.4 Depth-Duration Variation <br /> <br />The 24-hr mid-month convergence PMP values can be extended to other dura- <br />tions through application of rainfall depth-duration relationships. Durations <br />between 6 and 72 hours are required. Relationships were developed from 6/24- <br />hr, 48/24-hr and 72/24-hr ratios of rainfall in selected severe storms and <br />from maximum rainfalls of record at recorder stations. Seasonal and regional <br />variations of depth-duration relations are given. <br /> <br />2.4.1 Data <br /> <br />Hourly precipitation data for up to 25 years (1948-72) were available on <br />magnetic tapes for recorder stations listed in table 2.4. These stations are <br />located in the least-orographic regions shown in figure 2.1. Stations A, B, <br />C, D, and F in table 2.4 are geographically close to stations 3, 10, 11, 13, <br />and 23, respectively, in table 2.2. An additional station at Baker, Cali- <br />fornia (station E in table 2.4) was included in the southern Nevada subregion. <br />Although some of these stations (A to F) had records exceeding 20 years, only <br />