Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />downstream flooding. Also, soil and debris from land- <br />slides can "bulk" or add volume to otherwise normal <br />stream flow or cause channel blockages and diversions <br />creating flood conditions. Finally, landslides can negate \ <br />the protective functions of a dam by reducing reservoir <br />capacity and creating surge waves that can overtop a <br />dam, resulting in downstream flooding (as mentioned <br />above). <br />In turn, flooding can cause landsliding. Erosion, due <br />to rapidly moving flood waters, often undercuts slopes <br />or cliffs. Once support is removed from the base of <br />saturated slopes, Iandsliding often ensues. <br />Examples of interrelated landslide/flood events in <br />Colorado occurred: <br />. in Larimer County, 1976: the mountain torrent <br />flood in the Big Thompson Canyon; <br />. in Ouray (Ouray County), 1981 and 1982: debris <br />flows in the creeks feeding into the Uncompahgre <br />River (Canyon, Cascade, Portland, etc.) and <br />flooding in the Uncompahgre River itself; <br />. in Telluride (San Miguel County), 1914 and 1969: <br />debris flows in Coronet Creek and flooding in the <br />San Miguel River: <br /> <br />1080 <br /> <br />1060 <br /> <br />. near Lake City (Hinsdale County): Lake San <br />Cristobal was formed in prehistoric time when a <br />large earthf10w (the Slumgullion) dammed the <br />Lake Fork of the Gunnison River. The landslide <br />dam held, and the lake was formed. <br /> <br />Landsliding as Related to Seismic Activity <br /> <br />Most of the mountainous areas of Colorado that are <br />vulnerable to landslides have also experienced moderate <br />levels of seismicity in historic times. Recent studies by <br />the Colorado Geological Survey indicate that the poten- <br />tial for earthquakes in the state is even greater than <br />previously suspected. The occurrence of earthquakes in <br />landslide-prone areas greatly increases the likelihood <br />that landslides will occur and amplifies the risk of <br />serious damage to a level considerably higher than if the <br />processes occurred separately. Comparison of Kirkham <br />and Rogers' 1987 map of historic earthquake intensities <br />(Figure 13) with Wiggins' 1978 map of landslide potential <br />(Figure 1) emphasizes the relationship between <br />landslide-prone 3rtdearthquake-prone areas in Colorado. <br /> <br />1040 <br /> <br /> <br />-Modified Merealli Intensity <br /> <br />o <br />, <br /> <br />. MMI* VI I.~ MMI V D MMI IV or less <br /> <br />'00 <br />, <br /> <br />7 MMI where greater than contour interval <br /> <br />50 <br />, <br /> <br />Figure 13. Maximum historical earthquake intensities in Colorado (Kirkham and, Rogers. 1987). <br /> <br />Miles <br /> <br />20 <br />