Laserfiche WebLink
<br />+3 <br /> <br />+15 <br /> <br /> +2 +10 ~ <br />....., I (") <br />z c <br />~ , i: <br /> " " C <br />W ! f,-' I <br />a: l ~ ~ <br />::::) I ~ <br />+1 ;: +5 <br />f- I ; ( m <br /> 'I ;>, <br />a: ij !, ~ C <br />ct !I <l ( , m, c <br />w II I ~ I, il i r" m <br />c '; - ~tg t : .~:~ ~ <br /> I. <br /> 0' ie!j if'; I <br /> .i. _;~~~ ti: k -H~, ~ <br />~ 0 'rfr; n Il 0 ::0 <br /> I -t <br />J: C <br />f- I 'I ! I I ::0 <br />Z m <br />0 , CIl <br /> I ) <br />~ i ~ <br /> -1 -5 Z <br /> ~ ~ <br /> II MONTHLY DEPARTURE ;v\ ACCUMULATED DEPARTURES <br /> -2 -10 <br /> 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 <br /> YEAR <br /> <br />Figure 2. The 1975-1985 monthly and accumulated precipitation departures from the 20-year average <br />for Eagle. Colorado. <br /> <br />mitigation programs have been implemented in Japan and <br />other countries. Based on annual landslide loss figures <br />alone, consideration of such an effort would seem to <br />warrant the attention of political leaders, scientists, <br />engineers, and planners in this country. Although there <br />have been some impressive and successful local <br />demonstrations of landslide hazard mitigation in the <br />United States, information about these activities has not <br />been widely disseminated. <br /> <br />PURPOSE OF THIS LANDSLIDE <br />HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN <br /> <br />The purpose of this mitigation plan is to reduce <br />statewide actual and potential losses from landslides by: <br />. identifying local governmental strategies, plans, <br />and programs that can assist in loss reduction, <br />. identifying unmet local needs essential to the loss- <br />reduction process, <br />. identifying and developing state agency capabilities <br />and initiatives that can deal with unmet local <br />needs, <br />. developing cost-beneficial state mitigation projects <br />that may reasonably be expected to reduce land- <br />slide losses, <br /> <br />· educating state and local officials and emergency <br />response personnel on the landslide hazard and <br />potential methods for loss reduction. and <br />. establishing means to provide a long-term, con- <br />tinuous governmental process to reduce losses. <br /> <br />SCOPE OF PLAN <br /> <br />This plan recognizes the importance of taking landslide <br />hazards into account in community planning and land-use <br />management, and provides local authorities with a wide <br />range of possible strategies and regulatory approaches <br />for mitigating landslide problems in their communities. <br />Mitigation options are presented in this plan as projects. <br />Implementation costs vary widely. Estimates are <br />provided where possible. Where state and local govern- <br />ments' budgets allow, low cost projects should be under- <br />taken. When costs exceed immediate budget <br />capabilities, projecis may have to be implemented in <br />stages over several years, or federal assistance sought. <br />In view of local government's primary role in manag- <br />ing the use of its land, this state mitigation plan is <br />essentially a support document. It is one of several state <br />mitigation plans now being developed to reduce potential <br /> <br />9 <br />