|
<br />Page
<br />
<br />16. Detail from the CGS map showing generalized hazard zones for debris fans in the Ouray,
<br />
<br />Colorado area . , . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 27
<br />17, Sign placed in the hazardous mountain canyon areas of Colorado. . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . 31
<br />18. Index map for the 49 vulnerable communities, areas, and facilities in Colorado ..... 37
<br />19. The landslides at Dowds Junction, Colorado ..........,............,......... 45
<br />20. Mapped debris fans at Glenwood Springs, Colorado. . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . . . . 47
<br />21. Detail from the Grand Junction Ph min. quadrangle showing location of Santa Clara Avenue
<br />and the Lamplite Park landslide. . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 49
<br />22. Natural hazards mitigation management system organization... ...... ..... . ... . . 80
<br />23. Flow of mitigation actions through the proposed natural hazards mitigation system .. 80
<br />
<br />TABLES
<br />
<br />Page
<br />
<br />1. Relationship between potential landslide impacts, social and economic elements impacted,
<br />
<br />and their significance ,. . . . . . . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . 18
<br />2. Potential users of landslide hazard information. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . 22
<br />3. Examples of landslide/debris-flow hazard maps and reports for Colorado .......... 23
<br />4. Examples of producers and providers of landslide-hazard information ............. 24
<br />5, Examples of resources available for obtaining/transferring landslide information. . . . . 28
<br />6. Landslide-management techniques modifying vulnerability to landslides ..,... . . . . . 29
<br />7. Physical mitigation methods .. . .. . , .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. . .. . . . 32
<br />8. Vulnerable communities, areas, and facilities in Colorado , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 38
<br />9. Analysis of potential impacts of landsliding , . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
<br />10. Analysis of potential impacts and needs .......,............................. 51
<br />n. State government roles in landslide hazard mitigation. . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 54
<br />12. Federal government roles in landslide hazard mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . 54
<br />13. Loca1 government roles in landslide hazard mitigation . .. .. . . .. . .. . . , .. . .. . . , .. , 56
<br />
<br />14. Projects summary. , . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , 89
<br />
<br />ix
<br />
|