Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 Fort Comn~ Coloradoan <br /> <br />August 1976 <br /> <br />Flood'plain zoning: <br />Are there places <br />people can't live? <br /> <br />By JEANETI'E CHAVEZ <br />OftheCl>lonldoon <br /> <br />Prior to the Big Thompson River <br />flood, the mention of floodplain <br />studies or roning in Larimer County <br />evoked groans and often con- <br />troversy over the pogstble con- <br />fJ.scaUon of property rights. <br />And although the controversy <br />surely still exists to some extent, the <br />July 31 disaster has given ImpetU8 to <br />completing studies that had been on <br />the back burner so that some wn1ng <br />can be done. <br />In fact. a temporary floodway <br />district zone has been inlttated from <br />F.stes Park east to the county line <br />and wUl be in effect for the next six <br />months. <br />What specitic land uses may be <br />allowed for var10us sections of the <br />canyon in the future will be based on <br />those intensified studJes which <br />should be completed before the <br />temporary zoning expires In <br />Febnmry. <br />The zoning setting those land uses <br />undoubtedly wUl be more restrictive <br />than in the past. Very little could be <br />done then because most of the homes <br />and busines..'>es in the canyon were <br />built prior to the county's im. <br />plementatlon of a zoning system. <br />Now there Is the posslbWty of <br />more legal restriction on what may <br />be bullt there. but the situation <br />facing the LarImer County Board of <br />Commissioners In the months to <br />come should not be likened to <br />starting with a clean slate upon <br />which only the most advanced and <br />sound planning technJques may be <br />applied. <br />What may seem "best" for the <br />canyon and Its residents may not <br />jibe with reality, <br /> <br />AMONG TIIE Issues facing the <br />county ottlclals are: <br /> <br />-What rebuilding or new building <br />should be allov.'ed? <br /> <br />-wm U.S. 34 be put back In the <br />canyon in essentially the same way <br />it was prior to the flood? (Gov, <br />Richard Lamm has Indicated a <br />temporary road should be com. <br />pleted along that route by June I, <br />1977, but he wants the permanent <br />road to go over Pole Hill.) <br /> <br />-What land should be acquired for <br />a park or other public use to <br />preclude de....elopment of residences <br />or busInesses In the area? ' <br /> <br />-What land can be acqu1red? <br />Some property owners do not want <br />to sell their land i others are wUl1ng <br />to almost give it away; others can't <br />t1nd their land because the survey <br />describes the property using the <br />middle of the river as a reference <br />point. The river has changed <br />channels though. <br />Until the floodplain studies are <br />completed, many of these questions <br />may remain unanswered. However, <br />two factors are clear now. <br />Ftrst, the decision on the road will <br />be made within the next six months, <br />and although the commissioners w1ll <br />be able to recommend what route <br />should be lollowed, the final decision <br />rests squarely with the state. <br />According to Rex Bums, the <br />Larimer County plann1ng staff <br />member who haS been working on <br />the floodplain Ident1f1cation elfort in <br />the past few years, all the other land <br />use decisions pertaining to the <br />canyon are dependent upon the <br />decision on U.S. 34. <br />Secondly, some landowners must <br />be allowed to repair their homes. <br />Bums said those homes that are less <br />than half damaged may be repaired <br />and building permits are being <br />issued now for such work. Thus far, <br />two permits have been Issued. <br />Burns noted that tounty <br />regulations requlre a permIt for any <br />building work valued at more than <br />$100. In the case of f100d-damaged <br /> <br />homes, an Inspector will have to <br />check the home to determine the <br />extent of damage before the pennit <br />maybelssued. <br />WHEN THE temporary flood zone <br />regulaUon for the disaster area was <br />first considered, the term <br />"moratorium" was used, implying <br />that no bulldlng at all would be <br />allowed In the area. for six months, <br />but that 18 a m1snomer. <br />The regulation, according to <br />Bums, applies to those homes that <br />were damaged more than 50 per cent <br />or destroyed in the flood. <br />It also applies to proposed new <br />homes in the temporary f100dway <br />dIstrict which the commissioners <br />have defined as anything within the <br />high water flood mark. Bums said <br />he has had one inquiry concerning <br />building a home on a previously <br />undeveloped lot that Is within the <br />temporary floodway zone. <br />'nw>se homes that cannot be <br />repaired or rebuilt until the com. <br />mtss:Ioners adopt a pennanent flood <br />zone are legally termed "nOn' <br />existent" uses since they don't exist <br />now, even though they did prior to <br />the flood, Bums said. The homes <br />which may be repaired after ob- <br />ta1nJng a bulldlng permit now will be <br />considered "non-conforming uses" <br />when the new zone is adopted. <br />The permanent zoning wUl not <br />neeessarl.ly prohibit rebulldlng on a <br />site, but It may, depending upon <br />~hat the boundaries of the two <br />areas within any zone are. Those <br />two areas are known as "noodway" <br />and "noodfrlnge," <br />Bums noted that construction <br />usually Is precluded in a f100dway <br />district, but In other cases has been <br />allowed in the flood fringe If the <br />bu1ldlng is constructed so the first <br />floor Is above the lOO-year flood <br />level. If there Is anything below that <br />level, it must be "flood-proofed." <br />A loo.year flood Is one v.1th the <br />disastrous effects expected to occur <br />only once withln 100 years. . <br />However, the loo.year level may <br />not be the appropriate flood le\'el for <br />the Big Thompson River. That Is one <br />of the things the floodplain studies <br />now being conducted may help <br />determine. <br />Bums said floodplain study <br />techniques were developed In the <br />east and sometimes are not ap.- <br />propriate for the steep canyons of <br />the Rocky Mountains. <br />Ironically, the Federal Insurance <br />AdminIstration (FIA) had con- <br />tracted with Gingery and Associates <br />of Englewood on June 22, 1976, to do <br />a hydrological study of the river just <br />south of U:lveland and west to the <br />mouth of the canyon. Now that study <br />will be extended through the canyon. <br />In addition, Burns said another <br />f1nn wW be hIred through the bid- <br />ding process to do photogrammetrlc <br />survey mapping of the river. Bums <br />said a third firm, Wright. <br />McLaughlIn Engineers of Denver, Is <br />on a retainer through the governor's <br />office to coordinate the hydrological <br />and mapping stud1es. <br />'Tho6e two studies wW be com- <br />bined Into a "flood management <br />study." The governor has suggested <br />Wright-McLaughlin do that also, <br />Burns said. <br />The study will focus on what land <br />uses are delrlrable for various areas <br />of the canyon. It must consider past <br />land use patterns and ownership <br />patterns as well, Bums noted. <br />The recovery panel which Is to be <br />named by the governor and the <br />commissioners wUl oversee <br />development of the flood <br />management plan, Burns said. <br />The estimated $110,000 cost of the <br />studies Is to be borne by a <br />multiplicity of federal and state <br />grants. Bums said about 70 per cent <br />of the funding will be provided by the <br />FlA, with the remainder rom1ng <br />from the Colorado Water Con- <br />servation Board, LarImer County <br /> <br />"~"'t...- <br /> <br /> <br />Path of destruction <br /> <br />This aerial photo shows the path of the Big Thompson Riyer during lhe flood July 31. The riyer tore great c~unks out of U.S. 34. <br /> <br />lAP) <br /> <br />(through a technical assistance <br />grant from the Four Corners <br />Regional Commission), and possibly <br />the state highway department. <br />The maps produced through that <br />study will show both the traditional <br />l00-year flood anticipated level and <br />the flood of record level. The flood of <br />record Is the most disastrous flood <br />known, and in lhls case is the July 31 <br />cataclysm. <br /> <br />THE OOUNTY commissioners <br />will have at least two alternatives to <br />consider based upon those maps and <br />the management study. <br />Flrst, the entire permanent zone <br />could be the flood of record with the <br />floodway being the l(l().year flood <br />level. <br />Secondly, the l~year level could <br />be the woe with the noodway being <br />the mld.section of that. <br />Burns said it is conceivable that <br />the entire canyon could be <br />designated a floodway. <br />Also based upon the results.. of <br />those stud1es, actuarial rates; 'for <br />flood lnBurance for buildings within <br />the flood plain will be estabUshed, <br />according to Jerome Olson, re~ <br />administrator of the F~. . <br />Until those actuarillJ tablet are <br />established, Olson said anyone in <br />the county can buy fedetally. <br /> <br /> <br />subsidized flOOd insurance whether <br />they are In an Identlfled flood area <br />or not. The rate 15 .$25 per $10,000 <br />worth of coverage per year unW <br />then, he said. <br />Previously existing structures <br />(which become non-conform1ng <br />uses in zoning) are always eligible <br />for subsIdI%ed Insurance, he added. <br /> <br />Fe~era11y-subsld1zed . lnsurance <br />has been available In the county <br />since 1974. One property owner in <br />the path of the Big Thompson flood <br />carried the Insurance. For a <br />premium of $43, he has receive<i <br />S6,OCKI for repalrlng damage to his <br />house, Burns said. The insurance Is <br />available through licensed property <br />insurance agents or brokers. <br />When the actuarial rates are <br />established, anyone attempting to <br />build in the floodplain will find the <br />costs prohibitive unless the building <br />18 constnJcted to be above the 100- <br />year floo~ level. It will be <br />prohibitive in that banks will not be <br />allowed to lend money for con- <br />struction unless flood insurance can <br />be obtained. <br /> <br />IF CONSTRUCTION Isn't <br />possible, what will property owners <br />do with their land? What w1ll its <br />value be? <br /> <br />There are a number of alter- <br />natives. It has been suggested that <br />the county do something sUnllar to <br />what Rapid City, S.D., did alter the <br />flood there In 1972. The town bought <br />much of the flood area. that had been <br />devastated and turned It Into a park. <br />The commissioners are con- <br />sidering ho\r.' that may be ac- <br />complished now. <br />Commission Chairman John <br />Michie said, "We are looking at any <br />money possible for acqulrlng (the <br />land) for recreation and open <br />space." <br />He Is concerned that land be <br />bought to keep the economy 10 the <br />area. bolstered rather than h.a v1ng <br />the bottom of the market fallout. <br />Commissioner William Lopez <br />tends to agree, explaln1ng that i1 the <br />county Is planning to acquire land, It <br />should look at pre-flood land values. <br />On the other hand, Gov. lamm <br />has indicated that the state may buy <br />some land at post.f100d prices. <br />The "big question mark" Is <br />whether there are enough funds <br />avaUable for acquisition, said <br />Cornmtssioner Warren Wolaver. If <br />there is, a lol of land should be <br />purchased, he suggested, adding, "I <br />don't think anyone can dLsagree with <br />that." <br /> <br />m.rr WHAT AB011I' the existing <br />buUdings and the persons who want <br />to continue to llve there even if they <br />are in the path of another flood? <br /> <br />Lopez believes there are places <br />the county should acquire for the <br />future safety of the public and for <br />future flood control. If a person <br />wants to stay, "we have to try to <br />make them aware of the negaUve <br />aspects," and "to show them how it <br />impinges on his neighbors." <br />Nevertheless, he recognizes that If <br />the ttome or business still is In <br />existence, the county may be <br />"stuck." <br /> <br />Bums, asked how he felt having <br />worked on floodplain regulaUons, <br />zoning and flood studies for the past <br />few years to see the flood actually <br />happen and verify what seemed to <br />be "cry.wolf" wam1ngs, replied: <br />"It mal(es me kInd of sad. I can <br />understand how people feel (that) Its <br />a freak event...At the same time, the <br />public has to pay for these things. <br />The principle that government steps <br />In doing things for us Is not <br />traditional" In America but It Is <br />becoming so, he said. <br />And in the case of floodpla1n8, <br />"pl8.Mers have the right Ideas," he <br />explained-there are placts people <br />shouIdn'tUve. <br /> <br />Regulations enforced for temporary zoning <br /> <br />Although the boundaries of the <br />floodway and flood fringe districts <br />sUII must be established, the general <br />regulations covering floodplains <br />already have been adopted by the <br />county and are In force for the <br />temporary zone in the canyon:' <br />Under those regulations, the only <br />uses permitted In the floodway <br />district without a special penn\t are <br />agriculture, recreation and <br /> <br />"residential accessory" uses. <br />Conditions accompanying use <br />without a pennlt are that it not <br />obstruct the flow of the f100dway nor <br />wUJ any structure or equipment be <br />pennltted. <br />Special permits are Issued on <br />severa.! conditions Included that <br />."00 structure, deposit, obstroction <br />or other use shall be allowed which <br />acting alone or In combination with <br /> <br />exIsting or future uses adversely <br />affects the flow capacity of the <br />floodway or increases flood <br />heights." <br />Among the factors to be con- <br />sidered by the commissioners in <br />tssuIng special permits are: <br />- Danger to life. <br />-Danger of materlals being swept <br /> <br />away to other land, thus creating <br />the poss1bllItyof injurlngrthers. <br />-Proposed water supplyand sewer <br />systems and possible comminatlon <br />In the event of a flood. <br />-Relationship of the ,roposa1 to <br />the flood ma.nagement p-ogranl for <br />theart"&. <br />_ The safety at acress to the <br />property in times of noo4.. " <br />