<br />8 Fort Comn~ Coloradoan
<br />
<br />August 1976
<br />
<br />Flood'plain zoning:
<br />Are there places
<br />people can't live?
<br />
<br />By JEANETI'E CHAVEZ
<br />OftheCl>lonldoon
<br />
<br />Prior to the Big Thompson River
<br />flood, the mention of floodplain
<br />studies or roning in Larimer County
<br />evoked groans and often con-
<br />troversy over the pogstble con-
<br />fJ.scaUon of property rights.
<br />And although the controversy
<br />surely still exists to some extent, the
<br />July 31 disaster has given ImpetU8 to
<br />completing studies that had been on
<br />the back burner so that some wn1ng
<br />can be done.
<br />In fact. a temporary floodway
<br />district zone has been inlttated from
<br />F.stes Park east to the county line
<br />and wUl be in effect for the next six
<br />months.
<br />What specitic land uses may be
<br />allowed for var10us sections of the
<br />canyon in the future will be based on
<br />those intensified studJes which
<br />should be completed before the
<br />temporary zoning expires In
<br />Febnmry.
<br />The zoning setting those land uses
<br />undoubtedly wUl be more restrictive
<br />than in the past. Very little could be
<br />done then because most of the homes
<br />and busines..'>es in the canyon were
<br />built prior to the county's im.
<br />plementatlon of a zoning system.
<br />Now there Is the posslbWty of
<br />more legal restriction on what may
<br />be bullt there. but the situation
<br />facing the LarImer County Board of
<br />Commissioners In the months to
<br />come should not be likened to
<br />starting with a clean slate upon
<br />which only the most advanced and
<br />sound planning technJques may be
<br />applied.
<br />What may seem "best" for the
<br />canyon and Its residents may not
<br />jibe with reality,
<br />
<br />AMONG TIIE Issues facing the
<br />county ottlclals are:
<br />
<br />-What rebuilding or new building
<br />should be allov.'ed?
<br />
<br />-wm U.S. 34 be put back In the
<br />canyon in essentially the same way
<br />it was prior to the flood? (Gov,
<br />Richard Lamm has Indicated a
<br />temporary road should be com.
<br />pleted along that route by June I,
<br />1977, but he wants the permanent
<br />road to go over Pole Hill.)
<br />
<br />-What land should be acquired for
<br />a park or other public use to
<br />preclude de....elopment of residences
<br />or busInesses In the area? '
<br />
<br />-What land can be acqu1red?
<br />Some property owners do not want
<br />to sell their land i others are wUl1ng
<br />to almost give it away; others can't
<br />t1nd their land because the survey
<br />describes the property using the
<br />middle of the river as a reference
<br />point. The river has changed
<br />channels though.
<br />Until the floodplain studies are
<br />completed, many of these questions
<br />may remain unanswered. However,
<br />two factors are clear now.
<br />Ftrst, the decision on the road will
<br />be made within the next six months,
<br />and although the commissioners w1ll
<br />be able to recommend what route
<br />should be lollowed, the final decision
<br />rests squarely with the state.
<br />According to Rex Bums, the
<br />Larimer County plann1ng staff
<br />member who haS been working on
<br />the floodplain Ident1f1cation elfort in
<br />the past few years, all the other land
<br />use decisions pertaining to the
<br />canyon are dependent upon the
<br />decision on U.S. 34.
<br />Secondly, some landowners must
<br />be allowed to repair their homes.
<br />Bums said those homes that are less
<br />than half damaged may be repaired
<br />and building permits are being
<br />issued now for such work. Thus far,
<br />two permits have been Issued.
<br />Burns noted that tounty
<br />regulations requlre a permIt for any
<br />building work valued at more than
<br />$100. In the case of f100d-damaged
<br />
<br />homes, an Inspector will have to
<br />check the home to determine the
<br />extent of damage before the pennit
<br />maybelssued.
<br />WHEN THE temporary flood zone
<br />regulaUon for the disaster area was
<br />first considered, the term
<br />"moratorium" was used, implying
<br />that no bulldlng at all would be
<br />allowed In the area. for six months,
<br />but that 18 a m1snomer.
<br />The regulation, according to
<br />Bums, applies to those homes that
<br />were damaged more than 50 per cent
<br />or destroyed in the flood.
<br />It also applies to proposed new
<br />homes in the temporary f100dway
<br />dIstrict which the commissioners
<br />have defined as anything within the
<br />high water flood mark. Bums said
<br />he has had one inquiry concerning
<br />building a home on a previously
<br />undeveloped lot that Is within the
<br />temporary floodway zone.
<br />'nw>se homes that cannot be
<br />repaired or rebuilt until the com.
<br />mtss:Ioners adopt a pennanent flood
<br />zone are legally termed "nOn'
<br />existent" uses since they don't exist
<br />now, even though they did prior to
<br />the flood, Bums said. The homes
<br />which may be repaired after ob-
<br />ta1nJng a bulldlng permit now will be
<br />considered "non-conforming uses"
<br />when the new zone is adopted.
<br />The permanent zoning wUl not
<br />neeessarl.ly prohibit rebulldlng on a
<br />site, but It may, depending upon
<br />~hat the boundaries of the two
<br />areas within any zone are. Those
<br />two areas are known as "noodway"
<br />and "noodfrlnge,"
<br />Bums noted that construction
<br />usually Is precluded in a f100dway
<br />district, but In other cases has been
<br />allowed in the flood fringe If the
<br />bu1ldlng is constructed so the first
<br />floor Is above the lOO-year flood
<br />level. If there Is anything below that
<br />level, it must be "flood-proofed."
<br />A loo.year flood Is one v.1th the
<br />disastrous effects expected to occur
<br />only once withln 100 years. .
<br />However, the loo.year level may
<br />not be the appropriate flood le\'el for
<br />the Big Thompson River. That Is one
<br />of the things the floodplain studies
<br />now being conducted may help
<br />determine.
<br />Bums said floodplain study
<br />techniques were developed In the
<br />east and sometimes are not ap.-
<br />propriate for the steep canyons of
<br />the Rocky Mountains.
<br />Ironically, the Federal Insurance
<br />AdminIstration (FIA) had con-
<br />tracted with Gingery and Associates
<br />of Englewood on June 22, 1976, to do
<br />a hydrological study of the river just
<br />south of U:lveland and west to the
<br />mouth of the canyon. Now that study
<br />will be extended through the canyon.
<br />In addition, Burns said another
<br />f1nn wW be hIred through the bid-
<br />ding process to do photogrammetrlc
<br />survey mapping of the river. Bums
<br />said a third firm, Wright.
<br />McLaughlIn Engineers of Denver, Is
<br />on a retainer through the governor's
<br />office to coordinate the hydrological
<br />and mapping stud1es.
<br />'Tho6e two studies wW be com-
<br />bined Into a "flood management
<br />study." The governor has suggested
<br />Wright-McLaughlin do that also,
<br />Burns said.
<br />The study will focus on what land
<br />uses are delrlrable for various areas
<br />of the canyon. It must consider past
<br />land use patterns and ownership
<br />patterns as well, Bums noted.
<br />The recovery panel which Is to be
<br />named by the governor and the
<br />commissioners wUl oversee
<br />development of the flood
<br />management plan, Burns said.
<br />The estimated $110,000 cost of the
<br />studies Is to be borne by a
<br />multiplicity of federal and state
<br />grants. Bums said about 70 per cent
<br />of the funding will be provided by the
<br />FlA, with the remainder rom1ng
<br />from the Colorado Water Con-
<br />servation Board, LarImer County
<br />
<br />"~"'t...-
<br />
<br />
<br />Path of destruction
<br />
<br />This aerial photo shows the path of the Big Thompson Riyer during lhe flood July 31. The riyer tore great c~unks out of U.S. 34.
<br />
<br />lAP)
<br />
<br />(through a technical assistance
<br />grant from the Four Corners
<br />Regional Commission), and possibly
<br />the state highway department.
<br />The maps produced through that
<br />study will show both the traditional
<br />l00-year flood anticipated level and
<br />the flood of record level. The flood of
<br />record Is the most disastrous flood
<br />known, and in lhls case is the July 31
<br />cataclysm.
<br />
<br />THE OOUNTY commissioners
<br />will have at least two alternatives to
<br />consider based upon those maps and
<br />the management study.
<br />Flrst, the entire permanent zone
<br />could be the flood of record with the
<br />floodway being the l(l().year flood
<br />level.
<br />Secondly, the l~year level could
<br />be the woe with the noodway being
<br />the mld.section of that.
<br />Burns said it is conceivable that
<br />the entire canyon could be
<br />designated a floodway.
<br />Also based upon the results.. of
<br />those stud1es, actuarial rates; 'for
<br />flood lnBurance for buildings within
<br />the flood plain will be estabUshed,
<br />according to Jerome Olson, re~
<br />administrator of the F~. .
<br />Until those actuarillJ tablet are
<br />established, Olson said anyone in
<br />the county can buy fedetally.
<br />
<br />
<br />subsidized flOOd insurance whether
<br />they are In an Identlfled flood area
<br />or not. The rate 15 .$25 per $10,000
<br />worth of coverage per year unW
<br />then, he said.
<br />Previously existing structures
<br />(which become non-conform1ng
<br />uses in zoning) are always eligible
<br />for subsIdI%ed Insurance, he added.
<br />
<br />Fe~era11y-subsld1zed . lnsurance
<br />has been available In the county
<br />since 1974. One property owner in
<br />the path of the Big Thompson flood
<br />carried the Insurance. For a
<br />premium of $43, he has receive<i
<br />S6,OCKI for repalrlng damage to his
<br />house, Burns said. The insurance Is
<br />available through licensed property
<br />insurance agents or brokers.
<br />When the actuarial rates are
<br />established, anyone attempting to
<br />build in the floodplain will find the
<br />costs prohibitive unless the building
<br />18 constnJcted to be above the 100-
<br />year floo~ level. It will be
<br />prohibitive in that banks will not be
<br />allowed to lend money for con-
<br />struction unless flood insurance can
<br />be obtained.
<br />
<br />IF CONSTRUCTION Isn't
<br />possible, what will property owners
<br />do with their land? What w1ll its
<br />value be?
<br />
<br />There are a number of alter-
<br />natives. It has been suggested that
<br />the county do something sUnllar to
<br />what Rapid City, S.D., did alter the
<br />flood there In 1972. The town bought
<br />much of the flood area. that had been
<br />devastated and turned It Into a park.
<br />The commissioners are con-
<br />sidering ho\r.' that may be ac-
<br />complished now.
<br />Commission Chairman John
<br />Michie said, "We are looking at any
<br />money possible for acqulrlng (the
<br />land) for recreation and open
<br />space."
<br />He Is concerned that land be
<br />bought to keep the economy 10 the
<br />area. bolstered rather than h.a v1ng
<br />the bottom of the market fallout.
<br />Commissioner William Lopez
<br />tends to agree, explaln1ng that i1 the
<br />county Is planning to acquire land, It
<br />should look at pre-flood land values.
<br />On the other hand, Gov. lamm
<br />has indicated that the state may buy
<br />some land at post.f100d prices.
<br />The "big question mark" Is
<br />whether there are enough funds
<br />avaUable for acquisition, said
<br />Cornmtssioner Warren Wolaver. If
<br />there is, a lol of land should be
<br />purchased, he suggested, adding, "I
<br />don't think anyone can dLsagree with
<br />that."
<br />
<br />m.rr WHAT AB011I' the existing
<br />buUdings and the persons who want
<br />to continue to llve there even if they
<br />are in the path of another flood?
<br />
<br />Lopez believes there are places
<br />the county should acquire for the
<br />future safety of the public and for
<br />future flood control. If a person
<br />wants to stay, "we have to try to
<br />make them aware of the negaUve
<br />aspects," and "to show them how it
<br />impinges on his neighbors."
<br />Nevertheless, he recognizes that If
<br />the ttome or business still is In
<br />existence, the county may be
<br />"stuck."
<br />
<br />Bums, asked how he felt having
<br />worked on floodplain regulaUons,
<br />zoning and flood studies for the past
<br />few years to see the flood actually
<br />happen and verify what seemed to
<br />be "cry.wolf" wam1ngs, replied:
<br />"It mal(es me kInd of sad. I can
<br />understand how people feel (that) Its
<br />a freak event...At the same time, the
<br />public has to pay for these things.
<br />The principle that government steps
<br />In doing things for us Is not
<br />traditional" In America but It Is
<br />becoming so, he said.
<br />And in the case of floodpla1n8,
<br />"pl8.Mers have the right Ideas," he
<br />explained-there are placts people
<br />shouIdn'tUve.
<br />
<br />Regulations enforced for temporary zoning
<br />
<br />Although the boundaries of the
<br />floodway and flood fringe districts
<br />sUII must be established, the general
<br />regulations covering floodplains
<br />already have been adopted by the
<br />county and are In force for the
<br />temporary zone in the canyon:'
<br />Under those regulations, the only
<br />uses permitted In the floodway
<br />district without a special penn\t are
<br />agriculture, recreation and
<br />
<br />"residential accessory" uses.
<br />Conditions accompanying use
<br />without a pennlt are that it not
<br />obstruct the flow of the f100dway nor
<br />wUJ any structure or equipment be
<br />pennltted.
<br />Special permits are Issued on
<br />severa.! conditions Included that
<br />."00 structure, deposit, obstroction
<br />or other use shall be allowed which
<br />acting alone or In combination with
<br />
<br />exIsting or future uses adversely
<br />affects the flow capacity of the
<br />floodway or increases flood
<br />heights."
<br />Among the factors to be con-
<br />sidered by the commissioners in
<br />tssuIng special permits are:
<br />- Danger to life.
<br />-Danger of materlals being swept
<br />
<br />away to other land, thus creating
<br />the poss1bllItyof injurlngrthers.
<br />-Proposed water supplyand sewer
<br />systems and possible comminatlon
<br />In the event of a flood.
<br />-Relationship of the ,roposa1 to
<br />the flood ma.nagement p-ogranl for
<br />theart"&.
<br />_ The safety at acress to the
<br />property in times of noo4.. "
<br />
|