|
<br />I
<br />
<br />APPENDIX B SHEET 3 OF 6
<br />
<br />
<br />CITY OF LOUISVILLE
<br />DRAINAGE ALTERNATIVES
<br />DRAINAGEWAY "A"
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />A-I --+
<br />- -~-,-- I
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />WATER RESOURCES CONSULTANTS INC.
<br />
<br />FEBRUARY. 1982
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />.~:
<br />
<br />LEGEND
<br />
<br />~ : : : : : : : : : I
<br />~~
<br />V//#/#4'
<br />):(
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Grass channel with check drops
<br />(includes culverts)
<br />
<br />Riprap channel (Includes culverts)
<br />
<br />Concrete channel (includes culverts)
<br />
<br />Culverts
<br />
<br />A-V
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />r---ss....., Storm sewer (includes culverts)
<br />~ Detention improvements
<br />
<br />o
<br />,
<br />
<br />1000
<br />
<br />00
<br />
<br />3000
<br />,
<br />
<br />A -W
<br />
<br />A-1ZI
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />GRASS
<br />
<br />CHANNEL
<br />
<br />'YES
<br />With and w/o relocation
<br />of reach A- 1lI
<br />(Plan#l wlo $1,748,000.)
<br />Plan #1 wi $1,901,500.)
<br />NO
<br />High valued industrial
<br />area, proposed 48" RCP
<br />
<br />scale",ooo'
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />. Recommended alternative
<br />
<br />REACH
<br />(COST)
<br />A- I
<br />
<br />DEVEL
<br />
<br />STATUS
<br />QUO
<br />NO
<br />
<br />SELECTED
<br />STRUCTURAL
<br />NO
<br />Problems not localized
<br />
<br />RIP RAP ICONC.
<br />CHANNEL
<br />NO
<br />Adequale R,O.W. for
<br />grass channel
<br />
<br />STORM
<br />SEWER
<br />YES
<br />Requires 66' RCP
<br />for 2yr. flood
<br />(Plan +2 $1,446,500.)
<br />.YES
<br />1 OYr-t flood design to
<br />meet St. capacity criteria
<br />*1#2 2Yr.l54'O $251,500.)
<br />(#2 10Yr;/84"O$337,00,)
<br />.YES
<br />1 OVr~ flood design to
<br />meet St. capacity criteria
<br />*1#3 2Yr.l48'li> $447,000.)
<br />(#3 10Yr7172'O $511,000,)
<br />NO
<br />
<br />REGIONAL
<br />DETENTION
<br />NO
<br />Close to Coal Creek
<br />
<br />RELOCA TIONI
<br />DIVERSION
<br />.yES
<br />Combine with
<br />Reach A- 1lI
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Future
<br />low density
<br />residential
<br />
<br />Lack of adequate
<br />existing facilities
<br />
<br />Coal Creek 10 HWY 42
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Due to existing
<br />drainage problems
<br />
<br />A- II A
<br />
<br />YES
<br />
<br />Culverls al HWY 42,
<br />Laffayelle 51., Canon 51.
<br />(Plan # 1 $158,000.)
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Cone. channel through
<br />Industrial property
<br />(Plan #3 $921,500.)
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Adequale R.O. W. for
<br />grass channel
<br />
<br />Existing
<br />industrial
<br />and
<br />commercial
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Would aggrevate
<br />problems of
<br />other areas
<br />
<br />HWY 42 10 C. & S.R.R.
<br />
<br />High valued
<br />Industrial area
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Due to existing
<br />drainage problems
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Culverts al C. & S.R.R.
<br />Main 51. and Lafarge 51.
<br />(Plan #1 $422,500.)
<br />
<br />A- II B Existing
<br />C. & S,R,R. 10 residential
<br />Jefferson Ave.
<br />Ihrough Middle School
<br />A- ill Existing
<br />Jefferson Ave. to low density
<br />residential
<br />Soulh Boulder Road
<br />A-N Existing
<br />Goodhue Ditch to residential
<br />Davidson Ditch
<br />along S. Boulder Road
<br />A- Y Existing
<br />Jefferson Ave. to residential
<br />Davidson Ditch
<br />through Lake Park
<br />A - "lZI Future
<br />Coal Creek 10 HWY 42 low density
<br />residential
<br />A - 1ZII Existing
<br /> residential
<br />Colo, HWY 42 10
<br />Goodhue Ditch
<br />along Spruce 51.
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Through school
<br />property
<br />(Plan +2 $873,500.)
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Lack of storage area
<br />
<br />Would aggrevate
<br />problems of
<br />other areas
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />Generally adequate
<br />facilities
<br />
<br />'YES
<br />
<br />YES
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Adequale R.O.W, for
<br />grass channel
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Ditch structure, culverts at Improved channel, erosion
<br />Garfield and Jefferson control, ditch structures
<br />(Plan #1 $64,000.) (Plan +2 $591,500)
<br />
<br />Generally adequate
<br />channel
<br />
<br />Existing residential area
<br />
<br />Would sggrevate
<br />problems of
<br />other areas
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Culverts under ditches
<br />(Plan # 1 $27,000,)
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Inadequale R.O.W.
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />Requires 27" or 33"RCP
<br />for 1 OYr ~ flood
<br />(#2 2Yr.l24"O $254,500,)
<br />#2 10Y033'O$303,500.)
<br />NO
<br />Adequale R,O, W. for
<br />open channel
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Inadequate storage
<br />area available
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Diversion to Reach A- Y
<br />nol feasible
<br />
<br />Lack of adequate
<br />existing facilities
<br />
<br />Existing developed area
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />'YES
<br />Generally adequate
<br />facilities
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Ditch structures, culverts
<br />at Via Appla, Garfield St.
<br />pond Improvements
<br />(Plan #1 $112,00OJ
<br />NO
<br />Problems not localized
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />
<br />Above Via Appia Way
<br />(Plan +2 $710,500.)
<br />
<br />YES
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />Above Via Appia Way
<br />(Plan #3 $814,000.)
<br />
<br />Onsite detention for
<br />future development
<br />
<br />Would aggrevate
<br />problems of
<br />other areas
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Lack of adequate
<br />existing facilities
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />(Plan #1 w/o reloc
<br />. $936,500.)
<br />(Plan +1 wlreloc
<br />$215,500.)
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Adequate R.Q.W. for
<br />grass channel
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Open space use
<br />near Coal Creek
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />Combine with
<br />Reach A- I
<br />
<br />Close to Coal Creek
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />NO
<br />Lack of adequate
<br />exlslln9 facllllies
<br />
<br />YES
<br />Culverls al HWY 42
<br />and C. & S.R.R.
<br />(Plan # 1 $204,000.)
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />.YES
<br />10Yr. flood design to
<br />meet St. capacity criteria
<br />#2 2Yr.l48"O $755,500.)
<br />(#2 10Yr.l54'O $855,500.)
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />NO
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Lack of adequale R.O"W" Lack of adequale R.O.W.
<br />
<br />Onsite detention
<br />for future development
<br />
<br />Would aggrevate
<br />problems of other areas
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />-28-
<br />
|