Laserfiche WebLink
<br />54 <br /> <br />24,000 <br /> <br />Q <br />~ 20.000 <br />u <br />"' <br />'" <br />.. <br />"' <br />.. <br />I- <br />~ 18.000 <br />u <br />iii <br />:> <br />u <br />~ <br />:j 12,000 <br />.. <br /><( <br />:z: <br />u <br />'" <br />2i <br />" <br /><( 8000 <br />~ <br /> <br />LAWN LAKE DAM AND CASCADE LAKE DAM FAILURES, COWRADO <br /> <br /> <br />NOTE: R.sults Ir. for IIctuat <br />breach dimensions <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />\~ <br />'",- <br />'\~ <br />'\~ <br />" <br />'-. <br />'-. <br />........ <br />. lake Oam ........ <br /> <br /> <br />....... <br />"" <br /> <br />4000 <br />o 30 80 90 120 <br />TIME TO FUll 8REACH DEVELOPMENT, IN MINUTES <br /> <br />F1GUIlB 47.-Outflow discharge for various timas of breach <br />development for Lawn Lake dam end Cascade Lake dam, <br /> <br />TABLE 10.-Comparison of model results of a hypothetical breach width of 25 fset to tho actual <br />breach width of 65 fe.t <br /> <br />O_in_ <br />disclwp from <br />.......-- <br />in cubic teet per <br />....... <br /> <br />0_....... <br />etream from Lawu <br />Lake dam, ia <br />..... <br />0.0 <br />.55 <br />1.50 <br />3.33 <br />b 4.73 <br /> <br />5.36 <br />5.78 <br />c 6.50 <br />d 6.67 <br />e 7.68 <br /> <br />Peak diacbarp, iD <br />cubic feet per <br />....... <br />11,000 <br />10,000 <br />9,400 <br />8,500 <br />8,400 <br /> <br />7,500 <br />5.600 <br />5,200 <br />15,500 <br />9,500 <br /> <br />.7,000 <br />-6,600 <br />-5,800 <br />.4,100 <br />.3,400 <br /> <br />.3,400 <br />-1,900 <br />.1,600 <br />-600 <br />.400 <br /> <br />100 150 200 <br />BREACH WIDTH. IN FEET <br /> <br />FIGUIlB 48.-OutfIow discharge for bypotheticel breach width for <br />Lawn Lake dam, assuming lo-minute time of failure. <br /> <br />Is) (a) <br />(s) (a) <br />(s) (a) <br />(a) (a) <br />8,514.7 9.8 <br />8,510.3 9.3 <br />8,492.3 9.7 <br />8.054.8 9.8 <br /> <br /> 50,000 <br />Q <br />Z <br />Q 40,000 <br />u <br />"' <br />'" <br />.. <br />~ <br />I- <br />"' <br />"' 30,000 <br />~ <br />!.! <br />.. <br />:> <br />u <br />iii <br />ui 20,000 <br />'" <br />.. <br /><( <br />:z: <br />u <br /><Il <br />2i <br />" 10,000 <br /><( <br />"' <br />.. <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> <br />Flood elevatioD, ill <br />.... <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />NOTE: Results If. for II time of <br />failure of 10 minutes <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br />250 <br /> <br />M_fIood <br />dopth. in .... <br /> <br />JlHfwoDce ""'" <br />......... flood <br />depth of 56-loot <br />width. in feel <br /> <br />(a) <br />(a) <br />(a) <br />(a) <br /> <br />-.9 <br />..9 <br />..9 <br /> <br />'.1 <br /> <br />7.74 9,300 .400 8,042.8 10.8 -.2 <br />8.78 6.700 0 7,862.7 10.7 ..1 <br />f 10.28 6,200 .1,400 7,697.9 8.9 -.7 <br />g11.45 4,800 .1,300 7,579.8 6.8 '.5 <br />h12.50 4,800 .1,300 7,502.3 9.8 .1.3 <br />Average difference from meximum flood depth of 5Hoot width, in feat=-,6 <br /> <br />as.vere ch8DIUIl 8I'OIioa: computatioas aad. COl:Dpariaou are not applicable. <br />bSynthetic croa HCtioa bued OD CI'OSlII seetioD at. riVer mile 5.36. <br />cSite1. <br />dcaseadll Lake dam and Site 2- <br />'SIta3. <br />fSite.... <br />'SiteS. <br />.....S, <br /> <br />1-<6 <br />