My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06021
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:56:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Stream Name
Big Thompson
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood History of the Big Thompson River Basin: Flash Floods, Paleofloods, and Dam-Break Floods
Date
1/1/1979
Prepared For
Larimer
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br /> <br />LAWN LAKE DAM AND CASCADE LAKE DAM FAILURES. COLORADO <br /> <br />depthe would have averaged 0.6 foot lower; the flood wave would have <br />reached Estes Park at the same time. For tbis hypothetical case. <br />Cascade Lake dam still would have failed. <br />2. For a breach width of 200 feet, peak discharge would have been <br />22.600 cubic feet per second greater downstream from Lawn Lake dam <br />to 5,400 cubic feet per sacond greater at Estes Park. Meximum flood <br />depth would have averaged 2.7 feet higher; the flood wave would have <br />reached Estes Park 0.4 hour earlier. The model s1so indicated that <br />the outflow peak discharge from the worst-case failure of Lawn Lake <br />dam could have been at least 56,000 cubic feet per second. <br />If Cascade Lake dam had not faiJad (or had not been present). peak <br />discharges would have been reduced by 11.300 cubic feet per second <br />;mm""etely downstream from the dam to 500 cubic feet per sacond <br />less at Estes Park. Meximum flood depths would have averaged <br />0.6 foot Iowar. end the flood wave would bave reached Lake Estes <br />0.3 hour later. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Just before sunrise, at about 0530 MDT (Mountain <br />Daylight Time), on the calm, clear morning of Thurs- <br />day, July 15. 1982, the privately-owned Lawn Lake <br />dam, a 2&ft-high earthen structure, located at an eleva- <br />tion of about 11.000 ft in Rocky Mountain National <br />Park, breached due to a piping failure (Office of the <br />State Engineer, 1983). releasing 674 acre-ft and an <br />estimated peak discharge of 18,000 ft3/s of water down <br />the Roaring River (fig. 1). <br /> <br />I started to hear a sound liks ao airplane. Also, there were loud booms. <br />It got louder aod louder. I thought It was breaking the sound bar- <br />rier. I kept looking for a plane. but couldn't see ons.l got suspicious <br />aod started to look upstream. I saw trees crashing over end a wsll <br />of water coming down. I started to run as fast as I could for high <br />ground. There was a deafening roar. I fell end got up aod kept runn- <br />ing. I stood on high ground aod watched it wipe out our campsite. <br />It knocked everything in its path over; Steve didn't staod a chaoce. <br /> <br />With these words Steven Cashman described his har- <br />rowing experience with the flood that swept his camp- <br />ing companion to his death in the Roaring River. Other <br />campers along the Roaring River estimated the wall of <br />water to be 25 to 30 ft high, carrying with it large trees <br />and boulders. so that the water looked like a "wet, <br />brown cloud" and sounded like extremely loud con- <br />tinuous "thunder" or a "freight train." <br />The flood, attenuated by the relatively flat Horseshoe <br />Park (an old glaciallakebed), continued along the Fall <br />River, where it caused Cascade Lake dam (an approx. <br />imately 17-ft.high. 12-acre-ft capacity concrete gravity <br />dam) to fail because of tipping over from overtopping. <br />Peak discharge upstream from Cascade Lake dam was <br />7,210 ft3/s; however. discharge increased to 16.100 ftSls <br />or more as a result of the Cascade Lake dam failure. The <br />flood continued to attenuate in its passage down the <br />Fall River and through the town of Estes Park. <br />After Cascade Lake dam failed, two campers were <br />swept to their deaths a short distance downstream from <br /> <br />4-1 <br /> <br />the dam. The flood continued down the Fall River, caus- <br />ing extensive damage to homes, motels, businesses, and <br />bridges, particularly in the town of Estes Park. In Estes <br />Park. the flood entered the Big Thompson River for a <br />short distance before entering Lake Estes, which is <br />formed by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Olympus <br />dam. This reservoir contained all the floodwaters. The <br />peak discharge was 5.500 ft'/s entering Lake Estes, <br />which is about 12.5 mi downstream from Lawn Lake. <br />Peak discharge into Lake Estes occurred approximately <br />3 hours and 40 minutes after the failure of Lawn Lake <br />dam. In that brief time, three people were killed and ap- <br />proximately $31 million in private and public damages, <br />cleanup, and economic loss was reported. The flood <br />resulted in a Presidential Disaster Declaration for <br />Larimer County on July 22,1982. <br />The purpose of this report is to present the setting, <br />a snmmary of causes of the dam failures, the hydrologic <br />data on the flood. and to document geomorphic effects <br />of the flood. A secondary purpose is to present data ob- <br />tained from using a dam-break computer model to <br />evaluate that model's capabilities on high-gradient <br />streams, to enhance and provide supplemental <br />hydrologic information, and to evaluate various <br />hypothetical scenarios of dam.breach development and <br />probable impact of the failure of Cascade Lake dam. <br />Documentation and analysis of the flood should provide <br />valuable information on dam-breach floods of small <br />dams on high'gradient streams for future hazard mitiga- <br />tion related to dam failures. <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br /> <br />Data and data interpretation in this report are based <br />on the combined efforts of many private individuals, <br />and upon local county, Federal, and State agencies. This <br />assistance is gratefully acknowledged. <br />Many individuals provided valuable eyewitness infor- <br />mation that helped in the understanding of the flood <br />characteristics. Local residents also granted access to <br />their property to the field personnel working in the <br />flooded area. Appreciation also is extended to the of. <br />ficials of the town of Estes Park, of Larimer County. <br />and to National Park Service personnel who cooperated <br />and contributed data during the data-collection period. <br />Jack Truby, Colorado Division of Disaster Emergen. <br />cy Services. provided estimates of flood damages. AlIUl <br />Pearson, Colorado Department of Natural Resources, <br />Division of Water Resources. Office of the State Engi- <br />neer, provided information on the history and cause~ <br />of failures of the dams. William Stanton, Colorad< <br />Department of Natural Resources, Colorado Watel <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.