My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06021
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:56:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Larimer
Stream Name
Big Thompson
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood History of the Big Thompson River Basin: Flash Floods, Paleofloods, and Dam-Break Floods
Date
1/1/1979
Prepared For
Larimer
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />GEOMORPHIC EFFECTS OF THE FLOOD <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br /> <br />FIGURE 24.-Elkhom Avenue, Estes Park, looking downstream from river mile 12.0 (aerial). Big Thompson River is <br />along the right side of the photograph; Lake Estes is in the top righthand corner. Photo courtesy of Zenas Blevins, <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />coured reaches, very large boulders in ground moraine <br />rere undercut and had simply fallen onto the channel <br />loor. The criteria used to establish that a particular <br />IOU!.der did, in fact, move in the flood were: (1) Percus- <br />ion marks on all sides of the boulder, not just on the <br />lpstream side; (21 balanced and wedgedsma1ler rocks, <br />end broken and buried vegetation under larger boulders; <br />end (31 boulder clusters and berms in streamlined deposi- <br />ional forms, with imbricated structure parallel to the <br />low direction (fig. 301. Some of the largest measured <br />IOUlders known to have been moved in the Roaring River <br />ralley have dimensions of 5.5X8X12.5 ft, 7X12X13 ft, <br />Illd 3X7X8 ft. Larger boulders were observed in the <br />:hannel, but minimal or no evidence existed to indicate <br />hat they had been moved by the dam-failure flood. <br />Much less conspicuous. but nevertheless ubiquitous, <br />~ere sand deposits. Sands were deposited almost <br />:ontinuously, away from the main flood channel, within <br />;he edge of the surviving forest and vegetated areas on <br />he valley sides below high-water marks. Some sand <br />ieposits were 4 ft thick and had steep wave fronts <br />;acing downstream (fig. 311. Sand deposits along the <br />Roaring River are very coarse and massive. or have <br />weak horizontal laminations (fig. 32). <br /> <br />About 400 ft downstream from the Lawn Lake dam, <br />sand splays are extensively developed on the right bank. <br />High-water marks indicated the flood flow was 3.5 ft <br />deep over the top of these splays. Along the edge of the <br />splay next to the deeply eroded channel, back set beds. <br />interpreted to be antidune structures, were preserved <br />(fig. 331. These backset beds were diffuse, curved, and <br /> <br />TABLE 7-Clumnel conditions, Roaring River <br /> <br />DbtaDc:e dowDatream <br />from lAwn Lake dam. A__ c__ <br />iDmiln mperctllt """"""'. <br /> Below 1.... Lake clam <br />0.00-0.24 7.5 scour <br />.24- .68 6.9 deposition <br />.68-1.00 25 scour <br />1.00-1.16 9.2 deposition <br />1.16-1.49 23.5 scour <br />1.49-1.70 5 daposition <br />1.70-1.95 13.3 scour <br />1.95-2.23 5.5 deposition <br />2.23-2.74 7.1 scour <br />2.74-3.62 5.7 deposition <br /> Honesboe FaII& <br />3.62-4.02 26 scour <br /> <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.