My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD06000
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD06000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:57 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:56:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Arapahoe
Adams
Community
Aurora, Arapahoe County
Stream Name
First Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning
Date
3/1/1977
Prepared For
Arapahoe County
Prepared By
Engineering Consultants
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />major unforeseen changes, are reall~;ti: for future development. of <br /> <br />First Cr~~ek basin. At what time iTl tile [u1~ure such a level. of' <br /> <br /> <br />development will take place in FjrsL Creek basin is di.fficult to <br /> <br /> <br />predict at this time. <br /> <br />Uni~j-"'ograph" <br /> <br /> <br />Unit hydrographs were prepared for each of the 31. sub-basins <br /> <br /> <br />within the First Creek drainage and for the MonU)ello area in the lron- <br /> <br /> <br />dale Gulch basin. These hydrographs "ere prepared for both existing and <br /> <br /> <br />futu:ce development conditions. A Lola 1 (,f 70 un, t hydrographs "'ere pre- <br /> <br /> <br />pared. Then the design rainfall for 2-, 10-, awl lOO-year frequencies <br /> <br /> <br />were applied to the unit hydrographs to develop storm hydrographs. 11 <br /> <br />total of 210 storm hydrographs were developed. Losses were based on <br /> <br /> <br />evalllation of the soils survey for Adams all(1 Arapahoe Counties performed <br /> <br /> <br />by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service, n:'commencled ',alues in the Urban <br /> <br /> <br />Storfl Drainage Criteria Manual (USJJCM), >tudy of the natural depressed <br /> <br /> <br />areas, and existence of the East Branch of the Highline Canal and an old <br /> <br /> <br />cana:_ which traverses the First Creek basin. A~)propriate values for <br /> <br /> <br />losses as recommended in the Urban Strom Dr'ainagf~ Criteria Manual, were <br /> <br /> <br />Ilsed An average infiltration rate of or.e -half inch per hour, pervious <br /> <br /> <br />storage of O.lf inch, impervious storage (,f 0.1 inch and:) percent losses <br /> <br /> <br />were used in all cases. <br /> <br />S to rm -.!!L':lro gr a phs_ <br /> <br />The storm hydrographs for Lh. 25 sub-basins were added to- <br />geth{~r, taking into consideration the jiffpl~erlt l:ime and conveyance <br />charilcteristic:s of each reach into aCCOuD,t The storage aIId retarding <br />capacities of each structure on the water COUr-Sf were estimated, and the <br />resul ting combined hydrographs 11\-'ere devp 1 op(~d . Twenty-five "de sign <br />point.s", or critical places along the water courses were selected where <br />it would be useful to know the flow hydrcgl,olph f()r each design frequency. <br /> <br />1]....5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.