My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05980
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:30 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:55:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gilpin
Community
Black Hawk
Stream Name
North Clear Creek, Gregory Gulch, Chase Gulch
Basin
South Platte
Title
Reconstitution of 1979 Flood Peaks, North Clear Creek, Gregory Gulch& Chase Gulch
Date
4/26/2001
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Love & Associates, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, I <br />I <br />! I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />Flood peaks developed during 1979 for North Clear Creek, Gregory Gulch, and Chase <br />Gulch for the City of Black Hawk were reconstituted using the SCS TR20 computer <br />model. Similar to the 1979 analysis, the TR20 model uses a SCS "Type IA" distribution <br />for North Clear Creek and a SCS "Type II" precipitation distribution for Gregory and <br />Chase Gulch. Assuming Hydrologic Soil Group "B" soils, an ARC (AMC) of II, and <br />1979 land use, an average Curve Number of 79 was calculated for the study area. The <br />curve number was used to calibrate the TR20 model to 1979 flood peak calculations, and <br />the calibration resulted in a slight lowering of the average Curve Number in the study <br />area to 75.5. The Curve Number of 75.5 is within the range of curve numbers used for <br />other studies in the catchment which, ignoring the unrealistically low curve number of 55 <br />used by Futura, ranged from 69 to 85_ <br /> <br />The construction of reservoirs within Chase and Gregory Gulch watersheds reduce the <br />magnitude of flood peaks downstream of the reservoirs. Chase Gulch Reservoir reduces <br />the magnitude of historic lOO-year flood peaks by approximately 50 per cent at the outlet <br />of Chase Gulch. Chase Gulch Reservoir was modeled assuming the reservoir is full, and <br />inadvertent flood detention storage is provided above the emergency spillway only. The <br />emergency spillway elevation/discharge relationship developed by the design engineer <br />for the Reservoir was used in the TR20 model. Dorothy Lee Reservoir, a detention <br />facility, has only a minor effect on the magnitude of lOO-year flood peaks at the outlet of <br />Gregory Gulch. At the downstream limit of the study area along North Clear Creek, 100- <br />year flood peaks are reduced by approximately 200 cfs. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />Flood peak discharges for the 10-, 50-, and IOO-year flood events in North Clear Creek, <br />Gregory Gulch, and Chase Gulch calculated by the TR20 model with Chase and Dorothy <br />Lee Reservoirs summarized in Table 5 should be adopted by the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board. The flood peaks shown in this table represents current (2001) <br />conditions in the watersheds. Since the reservoirs are assumed ineffective in reducing <br />flood peaks during the 500-year event, 500-year event flood peaks developed in 1979 <br />using frequency analysis will not change. <br /> <br />-14- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.