My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05967
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05967
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:28 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:54:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Rivers Without Boundaries: Proceedings of the Second Biannual ARMS Symposium on River Planning and Management
Date
4/18/1994
Prepared By
American River Management Society
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
332
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12 <br /> <br />4 = shoreline more than 50 percent vegetated; some development is apparen~ but is relatively isolated. <br /> <br />5 = shoreline is more than 75 percent vegetated and no human intrusion is visible from the water. <br /> <br />Cultural Values: The goal is to recognize that the pattern of human use is tied to the enviroumeutal <br />oonditions of the river stretch and that the pattern of human use was established before European contact with <br />the region. The critical variable is the disturbance of natural vegetation and landforms. Managers should <br />ooncentrate development in high value culwral areas. Areas that show little disturbance may uot be appropriate <br />for human use (due to conditions of the soils, presence of wetlands, topography of the landscape). <br /> <br />1 = shoreline vegetation and topography not disturbed; river channel not altered; public land ownership; <br />not suitable for human use <br /> <br />2 = shoreline vegetation and topography intact; evidence of development for wildlife and recreation; <br />public land ownership predominates; limited human use (includes pipelines or powerlines); <br /> <br />3 = shoreline vegetation disturbed; topography not significantly disturbed; predominant land ownership <br />private; development in place for agriculture, forestry, transportation, and some residential use; <br /> <br />4 = shoreline vegetation and topography disturbed; variety of land uses present; land oWllership private; <br />water discllarge points; <br /> <br />5 = shoreline vegetation and topography altered by historic pattern of human development for town <br />sites; river channel altered by diversion or dam. <br /> <br />Scenic Values: Scenic values acknowledge the uniqueness and the diversity of the landscape. This may be the <br />most challenging of the values. One challenge is not to impose someone else's standard of beauty. Another <br />challenge is that typical measures of scenic attractiveness favor diversity of visual elements -- color, structure, <br />layers. A scale for north central Minnesota should value typical and unique landscapes of the region, eVen those <br />that may not be valued on a scale used in the Rocky Mountains or the Pacific Northwest. A third challenge is <br />acknowledging that human manipulation of the landscape is attractive to many people. The possibility of <br />human alterations to the landscape is the critical variable. Therefore, the rankings favor human changes that are <br />oonsistent with natural vegetation and topography, but gives the highest value to landscapes that have not been <br />altered. <br /> <br />1 = predominant view from the river is of human changes to the landscape; natural vegetation and <br />topography not discernible. <br /> <br />2 = view from the river is of human changes, where human changes complement the natural vegetation <br />and topography. <br /> <br />3 = view from the river is of vegetated corridor, some human alterations visible; <br /> <br />4 = view from the river is of typical vegetation oommunity and land fonn, such as sedge meadow, <br />black spruce fores~ upland mixed hardwood-conifer forest; typical landforms, including marsh, meadow, <br />bluff visible. <br /> <br />5 = view from the river is of typical vegetation community and land form; section shows a transition <br />wne from wetland to forest; creek to river; river to lake, or oxbow or island. <br /> <br />Scientific Values: Scientific values relate to the possibility of the natural or cultural resources oontributing <br />to human knowledge. Undisturbed vegetation oommunities offer opportunities to study the ecology of the <br />location; to study plants, animals, and the relationship between each. Undisturbed landforms are opportunities to <br />study the geology of the landscape. They also offer the opportunity to study the record of previous habitation of <br />the locality, through the excavation and analysis of cultural sites. <br /> <br />American River Management Society <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.