My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05944
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05944
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:24 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:53:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Saguache
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
Radar - Rainfall Reconstruction of the Saguache Creek Flash Flood of July 25, 1999
Date
6/1/2001
Prepared For
Saguache County
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Documentation Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Daytime heating of the local topography initiated the development of the storms. <br />The storm began raining in the basin about 300PM MDT, reached its peak rain <br />production between 330PM MDT and 430PM MDT and moved off the basin and <br />dissipated between 500PM MDT and 600PM MDT. The duration of the peak <br />rainfall was about two hours. <br /> <br />The storms were "locked" into the terrain by slow moving winds that flowed in <br />the cloud layer directly into an area of steep elevation gradient as new cells <br />developed over a small mountain immediately to the west of the basin. The axis <br />of the heaviest rainfall was along the mean winds in the 10,000 to 20,000 foot <br />layer of the atmosphere. The heaviest rainfall area was located over the middle <br />of the basin at elevations below 10,000 feet. The average elevation of the 5.00- <br />inch isohyetal was about 8,750 feet. <br /> <br />The storm produced peak radar derived rainfall of just over 5 inches at <br />elevations of 8,000 to 9,000 feet and produced rainfalls exceeding 4.00 inches in <br />elevations to almost 10,000 feet. This rainfall is among the largest estimated at <br />such high elevations in the Colorado Mountains. <br /> <br />The storm covered an area of roughly 72 square miles with a basin average <br />rainfall of 1.84 inches in this area. A smaller area of average rainfall of 3.50 <br />inches covered an area of roughly 30 square miles. <br /> <br />Cloud-to-ground lighting production of the storm produced several interesting <br />observations. First, the peak lightning areas hugged the terrain gradient areas to <br />the north and to the east of the storm rainfall area with over 80 percent of the <br />c1oud-to-ground lightning strikes in the 9,000 to 10,000 foot elevation band. <br />Most of these strikes were to the north of the heaviest rainfall area in an area of <br />decreasing radar reflectivity gradient, <br /> <br />A casual comparison of the radar-derived (RD) and run-off derived (RO) rainfall <br />patterns showed the RD areas of 2.00 inches or more rainfall as roughly twice as <br />large as the comparable RO area but the RO area of heaviest rainfall was about <br />twice the RD heavy rainfall area of 5.00 inches of rain or more. In general, the <br />two rainfall estimates identified the same areas of the basin impacted by the <br />flooding. A more quantitative comparison of these differences begs to be <br />accomplished. <br /> <br />In closing the rainfall values presented in this study should be of assistance in <br />providing an estimated but quantitative description of the storm. The advent of <br />radar coverage by National Weather Service W5R-88D Doppler radars allows <br />reasonable estimates of the spatial and temporal characteristics of heavy rain <br />producing thunderstorms across the Colorado Mountains. Additionally, the radar <br />observations afford the opportunity to provide quantitative estimates of the <br />amount and volume of rainfall. <br /> <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.