|
<br />Item De~cription Improvement Ouantity Unit Total
<br /> Number Cost
<br />15 18" RCP with 3':: cover 45 looLF 60.00 6,000.00
<br />16 5' radial inlet 46 3EA 2,00000 6.000.00
<br />17 10' radial inlet 46 1 EA 2,500.00 2,500.00
<br />l' 5' DIOR inlet 46 2EA 2,000.00 4,000.000
<br />19 30" RCPwith 2':!: cover 46 700 LF 75.00 52,500.00
<br />20 Manholes 6EA 2,200.00 13,200.00
<br />21 A~phalt replacement 1,200SV 15.00 18,000.00
<br />22 Utility Relocations and Misc. 115 25,000.00 25,000.00
<br /> Appurtenanees
<br />SUBTOTAL $678,975.00
<br />25% for Engineering, Legal and Contingencies $167,744.00
<br />TOTAL COST' $848,719.0((
<br />
<br />TABLE VIl-6
<br />
<br />PRELIMISARY COST ESTIMATE
<br />
<br />CRIPPLE CREEK DRAINAGE MASTER PIAN
<br />
<br />TOTAL L\fPROVEMENTS
<br />
<br />Item Deseription Total
<br />1 Pony Gulch improvements $653,500.00
<br />2 Thurlow Avenue Tributary improvements 13,750.00
<br />3 Second Street Tributary improvements 458,190.00
<br />4 Upper Cripple Creek improvements 197,250.00
<br />5 Cripple Creek ,,' tributary improvements 848,719.00
<br />" """"""''''''';hi'''''''''''''I''''''''''''''''},;'!;%;:;;>t;i;o I>' ';"", ,'n,,,,,,,
<br /> ,',,,,,,,,,,',, """'+',,1, "".",,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,"," '"",n
<br />TOTAL'COST""""!""",,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,!>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,;,, n, $2;171,409.00",+"
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />B. Proiect Prioritie~
<br />
<br />As the total cost for all drainage facility improvements rccommended in this master
<br />plan is approximately 2.17 million dollars, it will not be fiscally possible for tlJe city
<br />to undertake all projects at one time. Therefore, the projects have been prioritized
<br />with the areas of most immediate need given the highest priority where possible.
<br />When undertaking drainage improvements on a city-wide basis, it is necessary to
<br />make improvement~ at the downstream end of the system first. If this procedure is
<br />not followed, and upstream improvements are made priur to downstream
<br />improvements, flooding problem., can be intensified. This results because
<br />improvements collect greater amounts of n.moff than historic facilities had and these
<br />increased nows are directed into an area which has not been improvcd thereby
<br />magnifying the deficiencies in the downstream areas. One criteria llscd in the
<br />prioritil,ation ofimprnvement projects was the locatioll of the projeet with respect to
<br />the entire drainage system.
<br />
<br />\111-10
<br />
<br />VII.9
<br />
|