Laserfiche WebLink
<br />386 <br /> <br />g <br />~ 0.60 <br />c <br />.'2 <br />.~ C 5C <br />c <br /> <br />(al <br /> 08 <br /> 0,6 <br />. <br />0 <br />" <br />> <br />c 04 <br />0 <br />'0 <br />2< <br />0 <br />u <br /> 02 <br /> 0,0 <br /> 0 <br />(b) <br /> <br />P.J. BREMAUD AND Y.B. POINTIN <br /> <br />387 <br /> <br />FORECASTING HEAVY RAINFALL FROM RAIN CELL MOTION <br /> <br />.::.'.5-:: <br /> <br />CC 15 <br /> <br />dHSJ- 15 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />:),70 <br /> <br />~ <br />E- -2 <br />.s <br /> <br />,-~~ <br /> <br />,- <br />__,_J <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />- ~ -, - <br /> <br />. <br />0 -4 <br />" <br />> <br />c <br />,2 -- -- <br />.~ -6 . <br />U J <br /> 0 <br /> <br />20 <br />STEP NUMBER <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />~:_ - I <br /> <br />[ <br />8.4Cf <br />! <br />~.3C : <br />o <br /> <br />20 <br />SEP NUMBER <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />(el <br /> <br />RlJ 15 <br /> <br />dHS3+ \5 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />/-_:- <br />,-:-,' <br />.-- <br /> <br />? <br />'E6 <br />.s <br /> <br /> <br />. <br />o <br />" <br />> <br />c <br />2 <br />.~ 2 <br />U <br /> <br /> <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />20 <br />STEP NUMBER <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />20 <br />5 rr P NUMrJF:R <br /> <br />'0 <br /> <br />(d) <br /> <br />Fig. 7. Efficiency curves or the methods PERS (dotted line), EXTRA (dashed line), SCOUT 11.0 (dash- <br />dolled line) and PARAPlUIE (solid line) according to the criteria (a) ce, (b) RD, (e) dHSL and <br />(d) dHS3+ for the Paris 1989 event. <br /> <br />Fig. 7 (continued). <br /> <br />PARAPLUIE method detects the motion of the intense rain cells (CEL <br />echoes) inside each storm and the SCOUT 11,0 method detects the individual <br />motion of each storm (f echoes), As the rain cells are small and have <br />somewhat homogeneous motions, the relative perfonnances of the EXTRA <br />and PARAPLUIE methods are closely related for that event. The slightly <br />worse performance of the SCOUT 11,0 method relative to the PARAPLUIE <br />method shows that the motion of intense rain cells is different from the motion <br />of the storms in which \they are embedded. <br />Therefore, the PARAPLUlE method appears in this case to provide <br /> <br />against false alarms, to forecast the location of important hydrological events <br />and to evaluate the quantity of the observed rain at the forecast time better <br />in general than the SCOUT 11.0 method, <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />The best way to forecast rainfall at very short range is to extrapolate the <br />radar echoes in real time. This forecasting procedure is particularly well suited <br />for urban hydrological purposes, which require spatially and temporally <br />detailed forecasts (with less than I km spatial resolution and a forecasting time <br />interval of a few tens of minutes), For this last application, we have developed <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />