My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05866
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05866
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 7:07:08 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:50:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Summit
Community
Breckenridge
Stream Name
Blue River
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Draft Master Drainage Plan Breckenridge
Date
12/5/1989
Prepared For
Breckenridge
Prepared By
Lenzotti & Fullerton
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />sawmill Gulch <br /> <br />\)R~f1 <br /> <br />Sawmill Gulch has several complicated flood plain issues. As <br />previously discussed, there is the question of whether the lOa-year <br />discharge as defined by FEMA is low. In addition, due to the <br />channel having been relocated several times, in some places the <br />channel is actually perched above lower lying areas of its flood <br />plain. Consequently, when the channel banks are overtopped, the <br />flood can spread out for a significant distance. Finally, the <br />accuracy of existing studies is somewhat suspect. There is <br />considerable disagreement between the 1980 Breckenridge Town <br />Topographic Mapping and the FEMA topographic mapping. This is not <br />unusual since much of the area is heavily vegetated. Since many <br />of the FEMA cross sections were taken from the topographic mapping <br />they may be inaccurate. Additionally, the channel often does not <br />show up on the mapping so that the FEMA cross sections may have a <br />flat bed one hundred or more feet wide. This leads to flows <br />possibly spreading out further in their model than would be the <br />actual case. Finally, use of the Town topographic maps is not the <br />solution either. Several large discrepancies were found between <br />the Town mapping and cross sections surveyed for this study. <br /> <br />A complete description of the flooding problems and assessment of <br />the existing flood plain definition follow. <br /> <br />The designated discharge of 120 cfs can be adequately conveyed <br />through the existing storm sewer from upstream of Park Avenue to <br />the Blue River. However, between cross sections 8.0 and 8.1 the <br />flow may break out of the channel. This is not a certainty since <br />the accuracy of the topographic information is unsuitable to make <br />definitive conclusions. Because of the possibility of this <br />breakout, a large area of land has been mapped as potential sheet <br />flow areas. A similar situation exists near cross section 11.0. <br /> <br />Upstream of cross-section 11.2, the flows remain in the channel for <br />the 120 cfs lOa-year flood up to Four o'Clock Road. However, the <br />portion of the relocated channel downstream of the Tyra access road <br />culverts is much flatter than other sections of the channel. As <br />a result, sediment deposits are building up and could eventually <br />create flooding problems at the culvert or downstream. <br /> <br />There is a potential flow break out at the 4 O'Clock culverts. A <br />portion of the flow could leave the channel just upstream of the <br />culvert and follow the south side of 4 o'Clock Road. Additional <br />survey information would be needed to determine if this would <br />happen. In addition, the existing culvert is collapsing beneath <br />the roadway, probably due to inadequate cover. If the damage <br />continues, then a break out of flow would be certain. This could <br />result in a considerable amount of damage to developed areas <br />downstream. upstream of Four O'Clock Road, the channel flows <br />through wetlands and becomes confined on both sides by steep <br />slopes. There is no development in this area and consquently no <br /> <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.