Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />model demonstratlon on January 18. The UDFCD representatives expressed concern <br /> <br /> <br />that flows over the downstream embankment crest might attack the right bank of the <br /> <br /> <br />river due to the flow direction of water over the crest in the model. <br /> <br />They suggested a second model configuration to change the downstream crest to a <br /> <br /> <br />V-shape, a horseshoe or straight across so that water overtopping the crest would <br /> <br /> <br />flow directly downstream. The present design would include right bank riprap <br /> <br /> <br />protectlon with the present model configuration. Ben Urbonas further suggested <br /> <br /> <br />consideration of the boat chute in the middle of the embankment rather than on the <br /> <br /> <br />west bank. This, however, has been vetoed by white water boaters. <br /> <br />During the discussion that followed, C11ff Pugh of the USBR and Ron Rossmlller of <br /> <br /> <br />WWE made the following points on the pros and cons of these two suggestions. <br /> <br /> <br />1. The present downstream embankment configuration now has good flow lines.w <br /> <br /> <br />The current runs parallel to the crest at lower flows and angles towards the <br /> <br /> <br />west bank at higher flows. Both patterns naturally lead boaters to the next <br /> <br /> <br />chute. From 100 to 800 cfs, he flow velocities are such that boaters can slowly <br /> <br /> <br />paddle away from the downstream crest to line up with the second chute or they <br /> <br /> <br />can stay in the first pool if they so desire. <br /> <br /> <br />2. A straight or sl1ghtly curved crest at right angles to the channel banks would <br /> <br /> <br />direct the flow downstream of the embankment crest parallel to the river banks <br /> <br /> <br />or towards the center of the river. As a note, WWE discussed reducing the <br /> <br /> <br />angle of the downstream embankment crest with the river bank to reduce the <br /> <br /> <br />erosion potential with Cllff Pugh last December. The conclusion reached was <br />