Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Column 14 - Annual Cost <br /> <br />The annual cost is the anticipated total annual cost for the alterna- <br /> <br />tive, sometimes r"ferred to as the total cost to society. It is the <br /> <br />annual improvements cost in addition to the residual average annual <br /> <br />flood damage cost. <br /> <br />Secondary Benefits <br /> <br />The secondary or auxiliary benefits are not easily measured in terms of <br /> <br />dollars. Dollar values have not been assigned to these secondary bene- <br /> <br />fits. The secondary benefits are numerous. A listing of types of such <br /> <br />benefits is presented below: <br /> <br />o Lowered groundwater table <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />damages to be incurred after improvements. Data prepared by the Corps <br /> <br />of Engineers (March, 1977) was updated to 1979 based on bui lding cost <br /> <br />indexes publ ished in Engineering News Record. <br /> <br />Column 10 - Annual Improvement Cost <br /> <br />The annual improvements cost is the total expected capital outlay for <br /> <br />improvements. <br /> <br />It is the summation of the annualized construction cost <br /> <br />and right-of-way and O&M cost. <br /> <br />Co I umn 11 -Annua I Net Benef it <br /> <br />The annual net benefit is the difference between benefits of the average <br /> <br />annual damage reduction and the annual cost of improvements. <br /> <br />Column l2 - Present Worth of Net Benefits <br /> <br />The present worth of the net benefits is the result of the continuous <br /> <br />accumulation of the annual net benefit assuming a uniform flow and a 50- <br /> <br />year compounding period with an interest rate of 6-7/8 per cent. <br /> <br />Column 13 - Benefit Cost Ratio <br /> <br />The benefit/cost ratio is the annual damage reduction divided by the <br /> <br />annual improvement cost. The benefit/cost ratio shows the relative <br /> <br />economic merit of each alternative. Evaluation of the secondary and <br /> <br />intangible benefits is also an important consideration in the decision- <br /> <br />making process. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Controlled rising groundwater table after urbanization <br /> <br />Reduced street maintenance costs <br /> <br />Reduced street construction costs <br /> <br />Improved movement of traffic <br /> <br />Improved pub 1 ic health environment <br /> <br />Lower cost open space <br /> <br />Lower cost park areas and more recreational opportunities <br /> <br />Improved qual ity of streams <br /> <br />Opportunities for lower building construction cost <br /> <br />Opportunities for creating new water suppl ies <br /> <br />Opportunities for lower insurance rates on private and Federal <br /> <br />lands <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Intangible Benefits <br /> <br />Natural resource planning organizations in recent years have begun to <br /> <br />recognize the importance of the intangible components of resour~e util i- <br /> <br />65 <br />