Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />of Boulder. The Boulder City Council rejected both alternatives <br /> <br />Engineers to conduct a new study under the authority of the pre- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />and instead preferred a diversion channel along a major street that <br /> <br />viously authorized Boulder Creek Local Protection Project. <br /> <br />stead, the new feasibility study was incorporated into the Metro- <br /> <br />I n- <br /> <br />would have a benefit-cost ratio of about 0.6. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Boulder CECEP Subcommittee, in September of 1973, outl ined a <br /> <br />politan Denver and South Platte River and Tributaries Study, which <br /> <br />was then getting underway. The hydrology of the Boulder Creek <br /> <br />Basin was restudied in conjunction with this report using the <br /> <br />Environmental Protection Agency's Storm Water Management Model <br /> <br />(SWMM). Historical stream gaging records were used to check the <br /> <br />results obtained from SWMM. The results of the restudy revised the <br /> <br />estimated 100-year discharge from 7,400 c.f.s. to 12,000 c.f.s. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />12-point flood control plan as an alternative to plans presented <br /> <br />earlier by the Corps of Engineers. Their plan was to implement a <br /> <br />major program to reduce the flood hazard in Boulder using, for the <br /> <br />most part, a nonstructural approach based on advanced flood plain <br /> <br />management methods. The plan included field marking of the flood <br /> <br />plain and relocation, acquisition, razing, and flood-proofing of <br /> <br />existing structures. The goal of the CECEP plan was to obtain a <br /> <br />50- to 75-percent flood damage reduction. The plan also included <br /> <br />flood-proofing and regulation of future development, an early <br /> <br />warning system, and minor structural improvements. The CECEP plan <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />was based on a 100-year discharge of 7,400 c.f.s. <br /> <br />Flood control feasibil ity studies on Boulder Creek were conducted <br /> <br />during the course of study for Plan I based on an enlarged channel, <br /> <br />Plan 11 based on an excavated floodway, and Plan I I I hased on <br /> <br />flood-proofing and relocation. Plan 1 I I represents the alternative <br /> <br />favored by the Boulder Creek Subcommittee. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The Boulder City Council adopted the CECEP Subcommittee's plan in <br />1974. A resolution adopted by the City Council on 20 Agusut 1974 <br />requested implementation of the plan under provisions of Section 73 <br /> <br />Plans I, I I, and I I I were presented to the citizens of Boulder in a <br /> <br />series of eleven publ ic presentations and two days at a shopping <br /> <br /> <br />center information booth in April 1977. Subsequent to the meetings, <br /> <br /> <br />the Boulder City Council conducted two publ ic meetings to sol icit <br /> <br /> <br />citizen reactions. After considering the views of the publ ic, The <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />of Public Law 93-251. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The local plan was a major departure from the Boulder Creek Project <br /> <br />authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950 and would, therefore, <br /> <br />require authorization by the Congress. In view of the need for <br /> <br />h . . f 1 wh',ch m'lght result from a <br />Congressional aut orlzatlon 0 any p an <br /> <br />new feasibil ity study, it was deemed inappropriate for the Corps of <br /> <br />City Council expressed preference for the concepts of the excavated <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />floodway-based plan (Plan II) from the canyon mouth downstream to <br /> <br />17th Street and a combination of the excavated floodway-based plan <br /> <br />(Plan II) and relocation/flood-proofing-based plan (Plan III) from <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br />I <br />