My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05792
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05792
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:50:14 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:48:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Logan
Community
Merino
Stream Name
South Platte River
Basin
South Platte
Title
South Platte River, Merino
Date
5/1/1993
Prepared For
Logan County
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Dredqinq. This alternative consists of physically removing <br />the island from the channel. This would require excavation of the <br />material to an elevation low enough to allow the river to flow over <br />the top of the remaining sandbar at least 50 percent of the time. <br />This inundation would reduce the rate of buildup and decrease <br />maintenance cost. The geomorphic analysis indicates it takes 8 to <br />15 years for emergent sandbars to become fully vegetated islands. <br />The amount of material that would need to be removed is 166,600 <br />cubic yards, and a total of 13.8 acres would have to b.~ cleared. <br />Eventually, the island would most lik'~ly reestablish itself and the <br />material would need to be removed again. The expected life of this <br />option is 10 years. The life of this alternative could be extended <br />by periodic clearing of the vegetation on the emergent areas of the <br />sandbar. This could be accomplished by mechanical or chemical <br />means. The lack of vegetation will slm. the rate of sediment <br />deposition and extend the life of t:he project to 15 or 20 years. <br />The advantage of this alternative is immediate removal of the <br />island. The major disadvantages arE' continuous high maintenance <br />costs and possible adverse environmental impacts. A plan view of <br />this alternative is provided on Plat"e 12, and a comparative cost <br />estimate is presented in the next s,ection. <br /> <br />Channel NarrowinC(. This alternative consists of constructing <br />transverse dikes along the right and left banks upstream from the <br />bridge. These dikes 1f/ould constrict the river to a top width of <br />600 feet. It is desirable to have t:hE' fully constructed channel in <br />the center of the bridge; therefor<~1 'the dikes would need to be <br />constructed in stages due to the narrowness of the channel along <br />the right bank. As the island begins to erode, 'the dikes would be <br />extended until the top width is 600 feet,. Each dike would be <br />constructed to an elevation 2 feet below 1:he high bank, with the <br />crown of each dike remaining constant over 'I:he entire lem,th. This <br />should, with time, erode most of t:he island and create a self- <br />maintaining channel through the bridge. Because of the heavy <br />vegetation on the island, some clearing and/or dredging of the <br />island may be necessary to completely remove the island from the <br />bridge area. The major advantage to this alternative is lower <br />average annual maintenance. The disadvantages include a lengthy <br />construction period and possible adverse environmental impacts. A <br />plan view and typical sections are presented on Plates 13 and 14, <br />and a comparative cost estimate is presented in the next: section. <br /> <br />Sect.ion 22 - South Platte River, Mer:.no, Colorado <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.