My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05779
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05779
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:50:11 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:47:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Boulder
Stream Name
South Boulder Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
South Boulder Creek/ Flatirons
Date
12/5/1997
Prepared For
Boulder
Prepared By
Consultants
Floodplain - Doc Type
Community File
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Is"!.7 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />April 1, 1997 <br /> <br />Mr. Ed McDowell <br />Flatiron Companies <br />P. O. Box 229 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80306 <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Levee at Deepe Farm Pit <br />Boulder, Colorado <br />Job No. 25,385 <br /> <br />Mr. McDowell: <br /> <br />Enclosed are the results of our field and laboratory investigation we have <br />completed to date for the levee. Figure 7 shows the maximum section of the levee <br />of Station 122+00. We have summarized our completed analyses on the enclosed <br />drafts of the partially completed forms that will eventually be a part ofthe submittal <br />to FEMA. In summary, our preliminary opinions that the embankment meets the <br />FEMA certification criteria is continuing to be confirmed as our analyses are being <br />finished. <br /> <br />Figure I shows the locations of our test holes and test pits. Figures 2 through <br />6 are the summary logs of our test holes and test pits and the results of our field <br />permeability tests. Figure 8 shows the typical gradation of the levee fill and Table II <br />shows the summary of the percents compaction we calculated at the density test <br />locations. Table I shows the results of our laboratory tests. <br /> <br />The test pits TP-1 through TP-3 were drilled (excavated) with a large pier hole <br />drilling rig using a 42-inch diameter auger. The levee fill was very rocky and the <br />rocks were numerous and close together. Our inspection of the test pits revealed <br />the rocks were embedded in a densely compacted, clayey, sand matrix and it was <br />impossible to pry the rocks loose without loosening the matrix when we dug the <br />holes for the sand cone density tests. The "pilot hole" for the nuclear gauge probe <br />had to be advanced by driving a pointed steel rod into the ground with a sledge <br />hammer. <br /> <br />Review of the gradation test results (Figure 8) of two typical samples of the <br />levee fill shows that the levee fill is quite rocky and the samples had 40% to 45% <br />larger than the 1/4 inch size. Review of the percents compaction in Table II show a <br />range for the 15 tests (two of which were in the foundation ground at the bottom of <br />the fill) 75 percent to 103 percent. In our judgment these test results are not <br />reflective of the effort it took to excavate the test pits or the density of the fill as <br />evidenced by the difficulties in excavating for the sand cone tests or advancing the <br />"pilot hole" for the nuclear gauge. In our opinion, the levee fill is well compacted but <br /> <br />CTL/THOMPSON, INC. <br />CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br />1971 WEST 12TH AVENUE. DENVER. COLORADO 80204 . (303) 825-0777 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.