My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05777
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05777
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:50:10 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:47:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
243
County
Pitkin
Community
Aspen
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Aspen, Colorado
Date
12/1/1995
Designation Date
11/1/1985
Floodplain - Doc Type
Historic FEMA Regulatory Floodplain Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Roughness factors (Manning's On") used in the hydraulic computations <br />Were chosen by engineering judgment and based on field observations <br />of the streams and flood plain areas. Channel roughness values <br />used for the Roaring Fork River ranged from 0.04 to 0.045, while <br />the overbank values ranged from 0.08 to 0.1. The channel roughness <br />value used for Castle Creek was 0.045, while the overbank values <br />ranged from 0.08 to 0.1. For Maroon Creek, the channel roughness <br />value used was 0.045 and the overbank roughness value used was <br />0.08. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Starting water-surface elevations for the Roaring Fork River were <br />taken from the Flood Insurance Study for adjoining areas of Pitkin <br />County (Reference 9). Starting water-surface elevations for Castle <br />and Maroon Creeks were taken from the Roaring Fork River flood <br />elevations. <br /> <br />The hydraulic analyses for this study were based on unobstructed <br />flow. The flood elevations shown on the profiles are thus con- <br />sidered valid only if hydraulic structures remain unobstructed, <br />operate properly, and do not fail. <br /> <br />All elevations are referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical <br />Datum of 1929 (NGVD). Elevation reference marks used in this study <br />are shown on the maps. <br /> <br />4.0 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS <br /> <br />The NFIP encourages State and local governments to adopt sound flood <br />plain management programs. Therefore, each Flood Insurance Study produces <br />maps designed to assist communities in developing flood plain management <br />measures. <br /> <br />4.1 <br /> <br />Flood Boundaries <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />To provide a national standard without regional discrimination, <br />the 1 percent annual chance (lOO-year) flood has been adopted by <br />FEMA as the base flood for flood plain management purposes. The <br />0.2 percent annual chance (500-year) flood is employed to indicate <br />additional areas of flood risk in the community. For each stream <br />studied in detail, the 100- and 500-year flood plain boundaries <br />have been delineated using the flood elevations determined at each <br />crOSS section. Between cross sections, the boundaries Were inter- <br />polated using topographic maps at scales of 1:600 and 1:1,200, <br />with a contour interval of 2 feet (Reference 7). <br /> <br />The 100- and 500-year flood plain boundaries are shown on the Flood <br />Boundary and Floodway Map (Exhibit 2). In caSes where th~ 100- <br />and 500-year flood plain boundaries are close together, only the <br />100-year flood plain boundary has been shown. Small areas within <br />the flood plain boundaries may lie above the flood elevations but <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.