My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD05761
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
FLOOD05761
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:50:07 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 1:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
211
County
Larimer
Community
Fort Collins
Stream Name
West Vine Drainage Basin
Basin
South Platte
Title
Major Drainageway Planning - West Vine Drainage Basin
Date
12/1/1980
Designation Date
3/1/1983
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />stores, industrial manufacturing, office buildings or large <br />apartment complexes did not appear in the floodplain, This <br />fact eliminated categori~s such as loss of sales tax revenue, <br />loss of salary, inventory damage, ete, from the analysis. <br /> <br />Published relationships are not available for street cleaning, <br />irri(Jation ditch repair or the block <lnd s]ilb construction <br />encountered in the school district's shops, By naking conser- <br />vatively high estimates of costs per day and production per <br />day of the clear.-up and repdlr crews, costs were predictc<! of <br />$2.75 per lineal foot to clean inundated streets of mud and <br />debris and $2,000,00 lump sum repair costs for each canal <br />breech, Using these unit costs, clean-up contributes relatively <br />little to the total damages. <br /> <br />The low velocities greatly redueethe magnitude of damages due <br />to washouts and erosion, The peak 100 year flow generally <br />caused velocities of less than four feet per second across <br />open land. In discussing grass-lined channels, Ven Te Chow <br />reproduced a Soil Conservation service table recommending a <br />permissible velocity over alfalfa cover of 3,5 fps!6l Velocities <br />causing erosion over most grasses or grass mixtures are generally <br />higher thnn this. Therefore nO crosion losses were anticipated. <br />The low velocities and relatively short peak durations also <br />pose little threat to street embankments, The one instance ~n <br />Which washouts were retained as a damage category was at the <br />various irrigation ditch cros~ings. <br /> <br />Vi.D. <br /> <br />Depth-Damage Relationships <br /> <br />The cinder block and concrete maintenance buildings near Poudre <br />High SchOOL presented the situation of sustaining little damage <br />to structural finishes or contents while still producing the <br />indirect damages of clean-up, inconvenience and missed work. <br />The options available to estimate damage in this situation <br />were to either prepare a complete content and finish inventory <br />and estimat~ it~miz~d indire~t damages or to make what amounts <br />to an educated guess. In determining the procedure to be used <br />to esti~te d~m~ges, two facts Were considered. First, the <br />flood flows diverge in this area; thus there may be some variations <br />in water surface (see \lydrclulics sPCtion). Second, the low <br />development density and structure vnl~e througho~t the floodplain <br />creates a negative net benefit for all proposed alternative <br />drainagc improvemcnts (soe Economic jl,nillysis section), In the <br />absence of clear economic superiority the intangible and secondary <br />benefits of the alternatives will carry relatively more weight <br />in the deCision making process and the damage estimates relatively <br />less weight. In light of these facts, tho extra accuracy which <br />may be qained from a damage inventory WilS not deemed worth the <br />.:>tfort. Therefore ,1 total damage cstimat_e of two percent of <br />structural value was subjectively chosen for zero to one foot <br />of inundation, Depths over one foot were not encountered in <br />either shop building. <br /> <br />As Table 5 indicates, the retained d;;lInage categories are stU)0t <br />clean-up costs, irrigation ditch repair and clean-up, structural <br />and content damage to residences, mobile homes, churches, <br />dnd school district maintenance buildings. <br /> <br />Activities completed in this step include procurement of <br />published relationships, development of relationships where <br />no published data exist and structun, ilnd content valuation. <br /> <br />Tilt' F<,<l<,1:dl InSUrall"''''' A<lmlnistr..tion h"s prcpJ.red dco:th-d;:::r,:J.gc <br />tables for s<,veral types of residential construction. These <br />tables apply to the single family residences, duplexes and <br />mobile homes fou~d in the b~sin. At the low depths encountered <br /> <br />in the floodplain ~ost str~cturnl dan~ge eo~sists of damage to <br />the finishes a~d not the load bearing components or foundations, <br />Damages to the two churches in the floodplain, '~'hich are finished <br />similarlv to residences, were also estirr.'lted from these rIA tables, <br />, <br /> <br />-54- <br /> <br />-55- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.