Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />before any specific offers could/would <br />be made to owners. Small Business <br />AdministraIion (SBA) loans. for ex- <br />ample, had to be paid off 10 the extent <br />possible before a homeowner was paid <br />for Iheir buyout property. In addition. <br />all proceeds from National Flood In- <br />surance Policy (NFlP) claims were de- <br />ductible unless owners could show <br />proof Ihat funds had been spent on the <br />dwelling in quesIion. <br /> <br />The important point to be made <br />here. however, is that Ihe only efficienI <br />manner to '.c1ear'. DOBs was for <br />FEMA to do so because of their ac- <br />cess to NFIP, SBA. and other data <br />bases. Another key lesson learned IhaI <br />surfaced in Ihis process was Ihat ap- <br />praisals had 10 be in hand before DOB <br />information was released to <br />homeowners and community officials. <br />SIrange as it may seem, the value of a <br />property changed once Ihe actual de- <br />ducIions became known - if Ihe ap- <br />praisal was noI already in the file. <br /> <br />The process by which the value of <br />a dwelling was detertnined is anoIher <br />area deserving of special comment. At <br />the outset. pre-tlood fair market value <br />was to be Ihe price paid to an owner. <br />WhaI was not clear was the process <br />used 10 deIermine Ihis value and the <br />meIhod by which the ineviIable dis- <br />putes would be resolved. Very early. <br />some communi lies were allowed to use <br />the accessed fair markeI value plus a <br />factor which offseI any recognized <br />communiIy-wide shortfalls noted in the <br />assessment. Although this approach <br />worked for the most part, it became <br />increasingly clear Ihat the most appro- <br />priaIe process was to use board-certi- <br />fied appraisers to establish values. <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Even Ihis process had tlaws be- <br />cause many appraisers wanted to use <br />comparables 10caIed ouIside of a tlood <br />hazard area. This. of course, created a <br />false value since the property in ques- <br />tion was subject 10 tlooding. a fact that <br />in turn surely had a negative impact <br />on worth. Even though SEMA used <br />board-certified appraisers. problems <br />still surfaced. To secure expert advice <br />on disputed properties and 10 settle dis- <br />putes in a credible fashion. the State <br />reIained an independent appraiser with <br />a known favorable reputation. This <br />process worked. Not all properly own- <br />ers got whaI they wanted. and some <br />eventually refused the final buyout of- <br />fer. but at least the process was one Ihm <br />could be explained successfully to <br />elected ofticials and others who had an <br />interes!. The message is: use a board <br />certified appraiser only and have a pro- <br />cess to setIle disputes. <br /> <br />Several additional related issues <br />also are worIh a mentioning. The DOB <br />process must for the sake of adequate <br />control of the situation be processed <br />through the SEMA. With the need for <br />a speedy resoluIion of the situation for <br />earlier projects. communities were en- <br />couraged to pass DOB requests directly <br />10 FEMA. In return, FEMA would then <br />pass its response directly to the requesI- <br />ing community. This process in fact <br />was counter-producIive in that iI <br />slowed progress. FEMA Region VII.s <br />DOB office was very small - two <br />people at the mos!. <br /> <br />Because of Ihis. communiIies at <br />times had to wait several weeks for <br />FEMA's response - a delay Ihat was <br />unknown to the state. Many limes, once <br />SEMA became involved with a prob- <br /> <br />lem. questions could be cleared up rap- <br />idly. A good case in point involved the <br />official close out papers; the docu- <br />ments. usually no more than Iwo pages, <br />which contained a summary of Ihe ac- <br />tual property transaction. Earlier in the <br />process. communities were told 10 for- <br />ward close out paperwork directly to <br />FEMA Region VII. If the regional of- <br />fice received a close out wiIh an irregu- <br />lariIy - maybe a departure from state <br />policy - FEMA.s regional office had to <br />call the state for clarification. <br /> <br />This added to Ihe delays associated <br />with processing the action. The stale. <br />of course. was suffering from an unin- <br />Ientionally self-intlicted problem. be- <br />cause in trying to make the process as <br />easy for local communi lies as possible, <br />it had allowed an unfortunate bypass <br />of necessary informaIion to flow <br />around iIself. The message here is <br />simple - all information simply mllst <br />flow through the state coordinator. <br />This may seem like a lot of work and <br />needless layering, buI most assuredly, <br />the effort will pay big dividends in the <br />long term. <br /> <br />The message here isl <br />simple - all information <br />simply must flow through <br />the state coordinator... <br />most assuredly, the effort <br />will pay big dividends in the <br />long term. <br /> <br />'0M _~ _ &w. <br /> <br />'fV;,~_ ~ <br /> <br />Buck Kat!, <br />Deputy Director <br />Missouri State Emergency <br />Management Agency <br />