FLOOD05728 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1989] WATER RIGHTS PROTECTION 8. the Corps prepared and proposed more extensive regulations, tho agency became the subject of criticism and suspicion by formerly a dent supporters. The idea that farming practices, irrigation,. and municipal wat, supply projects could be prohibited or restricted by lengthy perm processing and adverse decisions was threatening, particularly to sem arid states. The result was an amendment sponsored by Represent tive James Wright to curtail 404 jurisdiction to traditionally navigab waters. The amendment, which passed the House in both the 94th and 95th29 Congress, would then have focused the Clean Water A, almost entirely on control of point sources through section 402, con bined with a cooperative state/federal approval and planning al proach to nonpoint source control through section 208. Reauthorization of federal clean water law was deadlocked frOJ 1975 to 1977, in large measure due to the 404 controversy. A compn mise was then forged in the Senate and in the Conference Committe through the efforts of two leading westerners who were members ( the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, SenatorMa: colm Wallop of Wyoming and Senator Gary Hart of Colorado. As result, section 10 I (g) was added to the Clean Water Act for the pUl poses of (I) reaffirming the long-standing primacy of the states ove water allocation decisions, (2) protecting water rights established b state law, and (3) directing federal agencies to develop pollution con trol programs that operate in concert with state water law programs. 3 As part of the compromise, broad jurisdiction was kept in the Corp for authorizing fills in the waters of the United States, increased em phasis was placed on exemptions for normal agricultural practices an, usage of general and nationwide permits, speedier review was require( for making site-specific permit decisions, J1 and EP A's authority WI!; retained for enforcement of the 404(b)(1) guidelines32 through a 40< permit veto,33 if necessary, to serve overriding national environmenta goals. Legislative history of the 1972 and 1977 Acts is key to under. standing the essential congressional compromises that were struck ir 28. 4 LEG1SLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT, supra note 27, at 131.5. 29. H.R. 3199. See 4 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF .THE CLEAN WATER ACT, supra note 27, a 1187, lJ63. 30. S. CONF. REP. No. 830. 95th Cong., 1st Sess. 2, 52. See 3 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THI CLEAN WATER ACT, supra note 21, at 186,236. 31. See 3 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT, supra note 27, at 348.51. 32. EPA Guidelines fOT Specification of Disposal Sites for Dredged or Fill Material, 40 C.F.R i 230 (1988).