|
<br />~'
<br />
<br />Allowing 5% for down time and misc, losses, kwh/yr, ~ 6,190,000 kwhJyr.
<br />
<br />
<br />6,190,000 x 22,9 mills/kwh, - 1979 rate - P,R.PA ~ $141,750/yr. gross revenue.
<br />
<br />
<br />CITY OF LOVELAND HYDROELECTRIC PLANT
<br />POWER OPERATION STUDY
<br />
<br />~.
<br />t~.~
<br />
<br /> NO, CFSI % % (11 NET (21
<br />MO, EPF, KW HRS, KWH
<br /> UNITS UNIT Q HEAD HEAD
<br />OCT, 2 24.2 96 101 88 273 922 744 686,000
<br />NOV, 2 20,8 83 107 90 290 861 720 620,000
<br />DEC, 1 23,9 96 118 88 320 121517 744 385,000
<br />JAN, 1 15,3 61 I 122 85 329 335 744 249,000
<br />FEB, 1 15,5 62 120 86 329 348 672 234,000
<br />MAR, 1 20.4 82 105 90 324 472 744 351,000
<br /> ,
<br /> i
<br />APR, 2 22.1 88 105 90 283 893 720 i 643,000
<br /> I
<br /> i
<br />MAY 2 25.0 100 100 85 269 , 907 744 675,000
<br />JUNE 2 25,0 100 100 85 269 907 720 653,000
<br /> I
<br />JUL Y 2 25,0 100 100 85 269 907 744 675,000
<br />AUG, I 2 25,0 100 100 I 85 I 269 , 907 744 675,000
<br /> , I
<br /> , , I I
<br /> I
<br /> I ,
<br /> ,
<br />SEPT, 2 25,0 100 100 85 269 907 I 720 I 653,000
<br /> i r
<br /> I i I
<br />YEARI !
<br /> I 6,499,000
<br /> I
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />Note: With only 1 unit operation would not be feasible below 20 cfs + considerably more
<br />than 483,000 kwh, (Jan. & Feb.) would be lost, Loss of revenue - 483,000 x ,0229 ~
<br />$17,060, Capitalized at 8% ~' $138,250 equivalent capital loss, Two units can be pro,
<br />vided at much less added cost.
<br />
<br /> (2)
<br />,,-.
<br />"
<br /> (1)
<br />
<br />Assume customary 115% load is ok,
<br />Generator Eff, taken as 93,5% av, KW ~ Q x H x ET x ,935 x ,746/8.8 ~ ,0793
<br />From Fig, 37, Mono, 20, reduced 2% because of small size .90% peak, 85% full gate.
<br />C-3
<br />
|