Laserfiche WebLink
<br />lJiscuss ion of Resul ts <br /> <br />The stage-damage functions for each land use category indicated in Table 1 <br /> <br /> <br />are displayed, one per page. The input index location data (DR card values) <br /> <br /> <br />for the two damage reaches analyzed are also shown (page 21 of.26) along <br /> <br />with the single flood event water surface elevations (SE card values). <br /> <br />The trace information (page 22 of 26) indicates that only two grid cells <br /> <br /> <br />identified with land use 4 and in damage reach 1 are included in the aggrega- <br /> <br />tion of damages for this reach with regard to the 1990 land use pattern. <br /> <br />(It should be noted that the grid cells differ in topographic elevation by 20 <br /> <br />feet). The accumulated damage (last column) for the second grid cell dis- <br /> <br /> <br />played reflects the combined aggregated damage for both grid cells (at the <br /> <br />index location) at the elevations shown. <br /> <br />As shown by the printed information at the bottom of page 22, a total of 309 <br /> <br /> <br />grid cells in the two damage reaches analyzed (damage reaches 1 and 3) fall <br /> <br /> <br />outside the aggregated elevation damage function ranges specified on the DR <br /> <br /> <br />cards. There are 12 cells with damages below the starting aggregation damage <br /> <br /> <br />elevation and 297 cells with damages starting above the maximum elevation <br /> <br /> <br />specified. <br /> <br />Aggregated elevation-damage values are tabulated for damage reaches 1 and 3 <br /> <br />on pages 23, 24, 25, and 26 for each land use category within the 1990 land <br /> <br /> <br />use pattern. (Note that the damages in land use category 4, pages 23 and 24, <br /> <br /> <br />correspond to the accumulated damages displayed for the trace output, page 21). <br /> <br />Exhib it 4-2 <br />2 of 26 <br />