Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(It should be noted from Table 4-4 that a significant reduction in potential <br />damage results from possible flood plain regulation). <br /> <br />TABLE 4-4 <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF EXPECTED ANNUAL DAMAGE <br />(in 1000's pf dollars) <br /> <br />Evaluation <br />Condition <br /> <br />Damage <br />Reach Ifl <br /> <br />Damage <br />Reach 1/2 <br /> <br />Damage <br />Reach 1/3 <br /> <br />Existing <br />Land Use <br /> <br />1.5 <br /> <br />2.5 <br /> <br />12.0 <br /> <br />1990 Land Use <br />without Flood <br />Plain Regulation <br /> <br />1033.3 <br /> <br />350.0 <br /> <br />32.7 <br /> <br />1990 Land Use with <br />Ground Elevation <br />Regulation <br /> <br />19.3 <br /> <br />63.8 <br /> <br />23.8 <br /> <br />1990 Land Use <br />with Zero-Damage <br />Regulation. <br /> <br />9.2 <br /> <br />6.7 <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />~ <br /> <br />The evaluation of flood plain regulation is not restricted to a IOO-year <br /> <br />flood plain, and it could be an alternative which is evaluated singularly <br /> <br /> <br />or in combination with other flood proofing alternatives. For example, a <br /> <br /> <br />combination of alternatives could place structures above the 75-year flood <br /> <br />plain and uniformly flood proof to the lOO-year flood event elevations. <br /> <br />4-27 <br />