Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Colorado Wildfire Hazard <br /> <br />The main aspects of intermix wildfires are: <br /> <br />e People cause most of the fires. <br /> <br />e Structure fires create risks to cuJjacent forest and <br />brush lands. <br /> <br />e Wildfires create risks to cuJjacent structures. <br /> <br />e Adequate {ire protection may not exist for struc. <br />tures. <br /> <br />e Structure fires create safety risks to wildland fire- <br />fighters. <br /> <br />e Wildfire suppression costs are not fairly bo~ by <br />those who create the risk in the intermix. <br /> <br />e Threatened structures change wildfire suppres- <br />sion priorities. <br /> <br />e Structure and wildland fire protection agencies <br />have a need for close coordination. <br /> <br />e It is difficult to mobilize available fire resources <br />{rom across the state. <br /> <br />The Costs and Who Pays <br /> <br />The intermix wildfire hazard imposes significant fire <br />protection costs on various segments of Colorado's <br />population. Aside from the impacted landowners, <br />Colorado taxpayers cover most of the costs of fire sup- <br />pression (depending on whether local, county, or state <br />fire forces are used). If federal assistance is required, <br />all taxpayers contribute. When forest and watershed <br />fires burn unchecked, an important Colorado resource <br />is destroyed. This can eventually result in a loss of tax <br />revenues. Again, all Coloradans pay. <br /> <br />The risks and extra fire suppression costs that result <br />from the existence of homes in the urban/wildland in- <br />termix effect all citizens of Colorado, either by threats <br />to public areas, shifts of scarce tax dollars, increased <br />taxes, losses of valuable watershed, or increased in- <br />surance premiums. The question is not whether to <br />provide fire protection, but whether the increased <br />costs of protecting those who contribute most to the <br />problem are allocated fairly. <br /> <br />Five major problems or issues need to be addressed <br />concerning Colorado's urban/wildland intermix fire <br />threat: (1) education and awareness, (2) preparedness, <br /> <br />(3) legislation/regulation, (4) emergency response, and <br />(5) secondary hazards. Each of these problems con- <br />tributes significantly to Colorado's overall wildfire <br />hazard situation. They will continue to surface as the <br />intermix situation intensifies or as solutions are de- <br />layed. <br /> <br />Mitigation Approaches <br /> <br />There are four methods of mitigating wildfire hazards: <br /> <br />1. Acting on the hazard. <br /> <br />. Fire prevention actions that target fuels or <br />ignition sources to eliminate the hazard. <br /> <br />. Fast, effective fire suppression action that <br />eliminates the threat of a disaster. <br /> <br />2. Redirecting the hazard. <br /> <br />. Fire suppression actions that keep an en- <br />croaching wildfire away from structures or <br />more vulnerable areas. <br /> <br />3. Interacting with the hazard. <br /> <br />. Vegetation management, fuel breaks, or fire <br />safety provisions incorporated into building <br />codes or development regulations which re- <br />sult in better survival of structures in wild- <br />fires. <br /> <br />4. Avoiding the hazard. <br /> <br />. Greenbelt or open space projects which cre- <br />ate beneficial uses while restricting struc- <br />tures from wildfire-prone areas. <br /> <br />37 <br />