Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Census figures for the area of Boulder County (found in Appendix I) <br />illustrate this phenor.1enon. <br /> <br />The problem of inconsistent data stems not only from the lack of typical <br />written historic sources, but also from discrepancies in scientific <br />sources as well. For the periods prior to the technology buildup in the <br />latter half of the twentieth century, the lack of historic technicul data <br />is evident. Scientific observations, or at least scientifically compiled <br />observations, were hindered by the lack of a reporting agency or by <br />the absence of hydrologic recording devices. Some hydrologic <br />information was contained in the Hayden Survey reports as early as <br />1875. The United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.), however, was <br />not organized until 1879. Although hydrologic inforr7lation was <br />contained in U.S.G.S. annual reports, its first water supply paper was <br />not published until 1896. Biennial reports of the State Engineers of <br />Colorado date only from 1881, In Boulder County, stream gauges huve <br />operated interr7littently since 1887, but some have been installed only <br />recently. These situations have caused significant gaps in the base of <br />historic scientific data. (Appendix II lists all stream gauging stations <br />with published records and their dates of operation in Boulder <br />County. )4 <br /> <br />THE PROBLEM OF MISSING SOURCES <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />I n addition to the absence of documentation creuted by the lack of <br />constant human occupation or the availability of scientific observations <br />and instrumentation, an additional problem exists--the luck of surviving <br />sou rces. <br /> <br />Non-scientific information is often affected to a great extent by the <br />absence of surviving sources. Although original field notes have not <br />survived, most United States and State of Colorado reports which make <br />up the bulk of the scientific data have been retained in agency <br />repositories or government docurlent collections. Most documents on the <br />County and municipal level remain as well. The lack of stream gauge <br />data in the Boulder County area can be supplemented by the <br />meteorological datu located in the federal records. Personal records <br />such as diaries, however, are not as well represented. Fortunutely, <br />County and local historical societies, museums, public and university <br />libraries have collected and preserved SOrle material. In rlany cases <br />these efforts have been too late to preserve a complete record of the <br />County's history. Collected issues of newspapers, in nany cases, have <br />not survived. Of the fifteen newspapers publ ished in Boulder County <br />in 1894, for example, issues of only four are left today in historical <br />collections. The absence of the others, which were long ago th rOVln <br />out, burned, or sirlply mislaid, nade the job of conplete examination <br />impossible. Nevertheless, early Denver, Jefferson and \Veld County <br />papers (to nane a few) carried stories of Boulder County's plight <br />during flood occurrences. <br /> <br />ORAL ACCOUNTS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Oral history interviews have also been used to supplement the data base <br />for this project. Admittedly, oral history has its limitations. Finding <br />