Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND HYDRAULIC STUDIES OF RIVERS <br /> <br />storm center is less than 1.5 inches. Another rule of <br />thumb is that for arroyos to flow, the curtain of rain <br />as viewed from a distance must be so dense that one <br />cannot see through it. <br />During three field seasons we were constantly on the <br />watch for thunderstorms and when one appeared close <br />enough to be reached in less than half an hour, we hur- <br />ried to get to it. By seriously chasing individual <br />storms, and even though helped by a rather intimate <br />knowledge of local roads and geography, we were able <br />in this period to obtain hydraulic measurements less <br />than a dozen times. Most of them were for locations <br />near Santa Fe, with the others at scattered points in <br />Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska. As will be de- <br />scribed later, the hydraulic characteristics measured <br />during storms include channel width, depth, velocity, <br />and suspended-sediment load. <br />It was our plan to combine the measurements of <br />hydraulic factors with data obtained in the field when <br />the channels were dry, and with information taken from <br />maps and aerial photographs, Slope was measured <br />with a telescopic alidade, and channel width was deter- <br />mined by taping or pacing. At the locations where <br />flo.w .was measured, material comprising the channel <br />bottoms was sampled, Drainage areas and stream <br />orders were determined from tlle excellent planimetric <br />maps compiled by the Soil Conservation Service from <br />aerial photographs and available for parts of central <br />New IvIexico. <br /> <br />MEASUREMENTS OF HYDRAULIC VARIABLES 1:-1 <br />EPHEMERAL STREAMS <br /> <br />GENERAL FEATURES OF FLOW <br /> <br />The ephemeral nature of flow in arroyos is their most <br />impressive characteristic, Flash floods are the rule. <br />A typical dry arroyo reaches peak discharge in less than <br />10 minutes, the high flood flow seldom lasts more than <br />10 minutes, and flow decreases to an insignificant <br />amount in less than 2 hours. <br />A typical flood rise of small magnitude is shown by <br />the series of photographs in figure 4. This series was <br />taken by Herbert 'V. Yeo, whose diligence in obtaining <br />sediment records added much to early knowledge of the <br />suspended load carried by New Mexico streams. His <br />work was the prelude to the establishment of regular <br />sediment-sampling stations in that State. These photo- <br />graphs present a graphic account of what we observed <br />several times during attempts to measure arroyo flow. <br />If a stream rises from nearly a dry condition to a <br />depth of scveral feet "ithin 10 minutes, one might well <br />speak of a wall of water coming down the channel. <br />Bores as large as 2 feet in height have been seen by <br />the authors. However, observations made during the <br /> <br />course of this study cause us to conclude that a "wall <br />of water" is less common than a rapid increase in <br />stage attained through a succession of small surges or <br />bores each a few inches in height. The rise shown in <br />the photographs of figure 4 is believed to be typical in <br />that the initial front does not amount to more than <br />half of the peak depth. Jahns (949) stated that <br />debris flows may have nearly vertical but slow-moving <br />fronts. As he pointed out, desert floods may include <br />all of the gradations from mudflows to nearly clear <br />water, We believe, however, that the faster moving <br />fronts are seldom vertical Hwalls of ,vater," but a <br />succession of small bores as described above; Jahns' <br />photographs also support this contention. <br />A flood in Canada Ancha Arroyo, July 26, 1952, <br />provided an exceptional opportunity to observe the <br />surges or bores. At maximum flow the width was <br />about 100 feet, mean depth was estimated to be 1 <br />foot, and mean velocity slightly exceeded 5 feet per <br />second. During the 5 minutes immediately preceding <br />peak stage, a series of bores each y, to 1 foot high <br />moved down the channel at a velocity estimatcd to be <br />greater than that of the water itself, <br />The approach of the third bore made it apparent <br />that they were spaced rather regularly in time. There- <br />after, we measured with a stopwatch the intervals <br />between successive bores whieh were 31, 35, 34, 48, <br />and 60 seconds respectively. Between surges the <br />watcr ~tage decreased somewhat, as judged by sub- <br />mergence and reemergence of a gravel bar in the <br />channel. Furthermore, the p-eak stage was much less <br />than the sum of the heights of the eight individual <br />wave fron ts. <br />The nearly constant period between five of the eight <br />surges seems to rule out the possibility that they <br />resulted from successive arrivals of flood peaks from <br />different upstream tributaries. Rather the bores are <br />a type of momentum wave associated with the hydrau- <br />lics of the channel itself. <br />One of our first opportunities to measure the flow in <br />an arroyo was in a narrow and steep-walled channel <br />cut in fine alluvium. After the stage had fallen and <br />the channel was nearly dry, we heard a succession of <br />"plops" which attracted attention. The source of the <br />noises turned out to be falling chunks of bank hitting <br />the nearly dry stream bed. It became obvious that <br />hank caving followed the flood recession, <br />On every subsequent opportunity, examples of <br />undercutting and bank caving due to high velocity <br />water were specifically sought, but never experienced. <br />Yet, without exception, caving of wetted banks into <br />the channel after the flood was observed. .\loreover, <br />Oil walking any dry arroyo one will find debris fallen <br />