|
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND HYDRAULIC STUDIES OF RIVERS
<br />
<br />storm center is less than 1.5 inches. Another rule of
<br />thumb is that for arroyos to flow, the curtain of rain
<br />as viewed from a distance must be so dense that one
<br />cannot see through it.
<br />During three field seasons we were constantly on the
<br />watch for thunderstorms and when one appeared close
<br />enough to be reached in less than half an hour, we hur-
<br />ried to get to it. By seriously chasing individual
<br />storms, and even though helped by a rather intimate
<br />knowledge of local roads and geography, we were able
<br />in this period to obtain hydraulic measurements less
<br />than a dozen times. Most of them were for locations
<br />near Santa Fe, with the others at scattered points in
<br />Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska. As will be de-
<br />scribed later, the hydraulic characteristics measured
<br />during storms include channel width, depth, velocity,
<br />and suspended-sediment load.
<br />It was our plan to combine the measurements of
<br />hydraulic factors with data obtained in the field when
<br />the channels were dry, and with information taken from
<br />maps and aerial photographs, Slope was measured
<br />with a telescopic alidade, and channel width was deter-
<br />mined by taping or pacing. At the locations where
<br />flo.w .was measured, material comprising the channel
<br />bottoms was sampled, Drainage areas and stream
<br />orders were determined from tlle excellent planimetric
<br />maps compiled by the Soil Conservation Service from
<br />aerial photographs and available for parts of central
<br />New IvIexico.
<br />
<br />MEASUREMENTS OF HYDRAULIC VARIABLES 1:-1
<br />EPHEMERAL STREAMS
<br />
<br />GENERAL FEATURES OF FLOW
<br />
<br />The ephemeral nature of flow in arroyos is their most
<br />impressive characteristic, Flash floods are the rule.
<br />A typical dry arroyo reaches peak discharge in less than
<br />10 minutes, the high flood flow seldom lasts more than
<br />10 minutes, and flow decreases to an insignificant
<br />amount in less than 2 hours.
<br />A typical flood rise of small magnitude is shown by
<br />the series of photographs in figure 4. This series was
<br />taken by Herbert 'V. Yeo, whose diligence in obtaining
<br />sediment records added much to early knowledge of the
<br />suspended load carried by New Mexico streams. His
<br />work was the prelude to the establishment of regular
<br />sediment-sampling stations in that State. These photo-
<br />graphs present a graphic account of what we observed
<br />several times during attempts to measure arroyo flow.
<br />If a stream rises from nearly a dry condition to a
<br />depth of scveral feet "ithin 10 minutes, one might well
<br />speak of a wall of water coming down the channel.
<br />Bores as large as 2 feet in height have been seen by
<br />the authors. However, observations made during the
<br />
<br />course of this study cause us to conclude that a "wall
<br />of water" is less common than a rapid increase in
<br />stage attained through a succession of small surges or
<br />bores each a few inches in height. The rise shown in
<br />the photographs of figure 4 is believed to be typical in
<br />that the initial front does not amount to more than
<br />half of the peak depth. Jahns (949) stated that
<br />debris flows may have nearly vertical but slow-moving
<br />fronts. As he pointed out, desert floods may include
<br />all of the gradations from mudflows to nearly clear
<br />water, We believe, however, that the faster moving
<br />fronts are seldom vertical Hwalls of ,vater," but a
<br />succession of small bores as described above; Jahns'
<br />photographs also support this contention.
<br />A flood in Canada Ancha Arroyo, July 26, 1952,
<br />provided an exceptional opportunity to observe the
<br />surges or bores. At maximum flow the width was
<br />about 100 feet, mean depth was estimated to be 1
<br />foot, and mean velocity slightly exceeded 5 feet per
<br />second. During the 5 minutes immediately preceding
<br />peak stage, a series of bores each y, to 1 foot high
<br />moved down the channel at a velocity estimatcd to be
<br />greater than that of the water itself,
<br />The approach of the third bore made it apparent
<br />that they were spaced rather regularly in time. There-
<br />after, we measured with a stopwatch the intervals
<br />between successive bores whieh were 31, 35, 34, 48,
<br />and 60 seconds respectively. Between surges the
<br />watcr ~tage decreased somewhat, as judged by sub-
<br />mergence and reemergence of a gravel bar in the
<br />channel. Furthermore, the p-eak stage was much less
<br />than the sum of the heights of the eight individual
<br />wave fron ts.
<br />The nearly constant period between five of the eight
<br />surges seems to rule out the possibility that they
<br />resulted from successive arrivals of flood peaks from
<br />different upstream tributaries. Rather the bores are
<br />a type of momentum wave associated with the hydrau-
<br />lics of the channel itself.
<br />One of our first opportunities to measure the flow in
<br />an arroyo was in a narrow and steep-walled channel
<br />cut in fine alluvium. After the stage had fallen and
<br />the channel was nearly dry, we heard a succession of
<br />"plops" which attracted attention. The source of the
<br />noises turned out to be falling chunks of bank hitting
<br />the nearly dry stream bed. It became obvious that
<br />hank caving followed the flood recession,
<br />On every subsequent opportunity, examples of
<br />undercutting and bank caving due to high velocity
<br />water were specifically sought, but never experienced.
<br />Yet, without exception, caving of wetted banks into
<br />the channel after the flood was observed. .\loreover,
<br />Oil walking any dry arroyo one will find debris fallen
<br />
|