Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br />;; <br />,,; <br />~ <br />;:; <br />>- <br />~ llJOO <br />" <br />;; <br />So <br />az <br />wa <br />wu <br />uw <br />X~ <br />w ~ <br />~w <br />a~ <br />a~ <br />WW <br />~W <br />~~ <br />~u <br />0- <br />W~ <br /> ~ <br />wu <br />" <br />~ <br />~ <br />'" 100 <br />u <br />~ <br />5 <br />a <br />a <br />~ <br /> <br />10 <br />I <br /> <br />PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND HYDRAULIC STUDIES OF RIVERS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />,," <br /> <br />Hudson ~urve for stations in <br />TaO!; arld$antl Fe Counties <br />defined as "Area 2" <br /> <br /> <br />100 <br />DRAINAGE AREA, IN SQUARE MILES <br /> <br />llJOO <br /> <br />10,000 <br /> <br />Fm1:1llE 21.-Relation of mean annual tlood discharge (equaled or exceeded in 2.3 years) to drainage area. Kllmber beside point is serial number in appendix. <br /> <br />of the two lines should be alike, and indeed, they are <br />similar. The intercepts should not be cxpected to be <br />exactly the same bccause the discharge determined <br />from flood-frequency data was chosen to represent a <br />frequency of 2.3 years. Tbe frequency of that dis- <br />charge which corresponds to full channel width is un- <br />known and necd not be identical to the discharge <br />ha~ing a 2.3-year recurrence. <br />It should be recognized that cach of the graphical <br />relations presented has considerable scatter owing to <br />the nature of the measurement.s and the inherent <br />variability of these factors in the field. It should not <br />be inferred that a relation such as that presented be- <br />tween discharge and stream order is considered precise. <br />Rather we are concerned with explaining a methodology <br />by which generalized relations can be obtained, and with <br />demonstrating the nature of the interrelations between <br />a variety of hydraulic and physiographic factors. <br />In summary, it has becn shown that the ephemeral <br />streams in N e\\T 1:fexico are characterized by a uniform <br /> <br />do\vnstream increase of width, depth, and velocity <br />with stream order, and also with drainage-basin size. <br />Increasing size of drainage basins is accompanied by a <br />do\vnstream increase in discharge. Furthermore, the <br />interrelations among all of these factors, both hydraulic <br />and physiographic, may be expressed in simple terms, <br />either as exponential or power functions. The method <br />of combining the hydraulic variables with factors <br />measured on a map or obtained in the field from a dry <br />stream bed allows a sincple means of obtaining inter- <br />relations which cannot be measured directly. <br /> <br />SOME RELATIONS OF HYDRAULIC AND PHYSIO_ <br />GRAPHIC FACTORS TO THE LONGITUDINAL PROFILE <br /> <br />CHANNEL ROUGHNESS AND PARTICLE SIZE <br /> <br />The longitudinal profile of a river is ordinarily drawn <br />as a graph showing elevation as a function of horizontal <br />distance from the headwaters. Hack (1955) showed <br />that if slope were substituted for elevation as the ordi- <br />nate, the gradual downstream decrease in streaIll gradi- <br />