Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IX. ESTIMATED COSTS OF PRELIMINARY DESIGN <br /> <br />X. PROJECT IMPLEMENTAl"IUN ANil PHASING <br /> <br />Est"nal~'d coslS or the improvement. proposed in the preliminary dc.igns of this Masler PI~n arc presenled <br />in Table -), Unil com (see Table - 2) for lhe various ilems are based on current typical COM! for Ihe <br />improvements descril><:d COSIS of righHlf-way 0' easement acquisili,ms have nol been included as all <br />pro[>Oscd faeilitics arc generally localed in public righls-of-way and casements. The unit COSIS include <br />.Ilowanc", for inlel' manhole!. payemen! remov~l and replacement, IraI' I'" control. engineering. staking. <br />inspcclionand malerial lesling. <br /> <br />The pha.ling and implerTICntationof.\1asterPlanncd facilili.. arc gencrally governcdby.i. factors: public <br /><3fely. publi" perception of problem area" projecl finallCing and "ost. right-of.w,1y acqui,ilion. <br />devclopmcm prc,^ure. and jurisdictional control. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />II is nOledIha! significantcO!ldcvialions fromlhose presented in Table-) may heineurrcd during projecl <br />implementalion due 10 Ihe acruallocalion of existing miliuc< and lhe need for utility relocalion. &<cd on <br />available informalion, an allowance formilily relocalionha, l><:eninc1uded inlhecoslcslimales, However, <br />a comprchensive desc,iplion of all mlderground ulililies along the prop osed alignmenls IS nOl available al the <br />presenl mnc. Where known conflict' occur, ul'lity relocation costs are included for wmer lines and sanilary <br />sewefli ide",ifled Jnthe p"'l"'s<:d "t""".ewcr promedrawings, <br /> <br />Puhlic safely i.generally ranked in ,'arious orders of risk. Low priorilyprujcclsare Ihose where exisling <br />eOnditions do nOl pose a serious risk to loss of human life "nd would c"use minimal damage to p,i,'ate <br />properly or puhli, improvement.. High priorily projects are th",e where exi'ling condilions pose a high <br />polential fOlios. of human life and/or would cause severe damage 10 publi, improvements or privale <br />property. <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />Puhlic perceplion of problem arcas is impon~m ,ince it i" often a ga~e as 10 where Ihc general public <br />believes ,heir la. dollars should be spcnl. Projecls which solve pubi,cally perceived problem areas <br />generally recdve rn"republiesuppon whiCh aSSiSI! in lhe overall implemenlalion of the proje"t. especially <br />,n difficull COtl'trUCllotl ~rea' (e.g, high-volume interseclions). <br /> <br />In most municipalities. funds arc not oumcicm 10 wl,.e all "f the p"ol>lcm~ in " ,'ery ,horl lime frame (i,e, <br />5 III 10 yc,rs), Thcrefore. avaihbilil)" of public improvement funds play' a 'ignificant role in <br />determining the phasing and impkmcntalion "hedule. In man)' ='. scvc<al years of funding may need <br />10 be eombincd hdore a Jarge cu'lly projeclean he funded forcon'lmclion, <br /> <br />Riglll.Or-way plays a pan in project implementalion and pha.mg ,ince righl-of.way may !leed 10 be <br />acqoir~>d in advance of a given projecl to aV<lid dd'Yl in fiMI wnl,ruclion implemem~liol1, <br /> <br />Dcvcl()pmcm pre",urcs neate lwo oppoSilC effects on prajecl implementationipha,ing. Finl, devei"pmcnl <br />occurring upstream of a problem arc" may increase lhe local problem for Ihe more frequenl SIOrm cvent.. <br />lhus crealing pre,^ure!O -mo,o-up' Ihe projecl s<:hedule, However. if properly planned. dc,'eiopmem can <br />be used to leverage projeel funding 10 'olve a problem sooner lhan couid have been solved wilhom lhe <br />developmem, This factor becomes null when .1 proj.e, i, in a full}' develorcd basiu withoul I""sihility of <br />redevelopmcnt. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />